Re: Quik and framebuffer problems on StarMax

2003-06-07 Thread Boris Bezlaj
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:54:01PM -0700, Thanasis Kinias wrote: > scripsit Boris Bezlaj: > > > I also have IMS TT 128 with 8MB ram..it may be similar to yours. With > > stock kernel i have problems initializing it(only works with > > video=ofonly..kind of). I patched the driver to force the det

Re: Quik and framebuffer problems on StarMax

2003-06-06 Thread Thanasis Kinias
scripsit Boris Bezlaj: > I also have IMS TT 128 with 8MB ram..it may be similar to yours. With > stock kernel i have problems initializing it(only works with > video=ofonly..kind of). I patched the driver to force the detection of > TI TVP3030 ramdac instead of IBM ramdac(seems like they use the

Re: Quik and framebuffer problems on StarMax

2003-06-06 Thread Boris Bezlaj
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 07:02:47PM -0700, Thanasis Kinias wrote: > > If I boot without any video= argument, _sometimes_ it will boot cleanly > with the atyfb driver running the ATI card and the imsttfb running the > TT128. If I explicitly use video=atyfb, however, I get a kernel oops as > soon as

Re: Quik and framebuffer problems on StarMax

2003-06-05 Thread Chris Tillman
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 07:02:47PM -0700, Thanasis Kinias wrote: > OK, I'm back for more help... > > The most frustrating thing here is that two boots with the same options > can produce different results -- it seems to `remember' previous > configurations somehow... I also cannot find documentat

Quik and framebuffer problems on StarMax

2003-06-05 Thread Thanasis Kinias
OK, I'm back for more help... Thanks to the help I got from the list, I've got my StarMax running nicely with a 2.4.20 kernel -- provided I only log in over the network and provided I don't attempt to mess with the framebuffers. I'm working with a StarMax 5000/300 Twin Turbo, running Sarge. It's