At 01:03 -0600 2000-02-16, Jefferson Provost wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> I posted a URL to them not long ago:
>>
>> http://www.them.org/~drow/boot-floppies-1/
>>
>> These are a bit old; I know for a fact the keyboard stuff is still
>> broken on them. I'll try to make a
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 03:19:36PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 04:39:21AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > And when *are* we going to see a set of 2.2.x floppies for ppc anyway?
>
> I posted a URL to them not long ago
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 03:19:36PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 04:39:21AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > am i the only one who thinks `archetecture not supported' should come
> > with a `I don't care' button? (yeah yeah one of these days i'll start
> > mucking with the
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 03:13:00PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> Amen. I've asked for more help on doing actual boot-floppy builds and
> testing for a while. I'm leaving my current employer that paid me to spend
> _some_ time getting Debian ported to PReP and so I did the last build of
> boot-flop
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 09:41:58PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 04:39:21AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > am i the only one who thinks `archetecture not supported' should come
> > > with a `I don't care' button? (yeah
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 04:39:21AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > am i the only one who thinks `archetecture not supported' should come
> > with a `I don't care' button? (yeah yeah one of these days i'll start
> > mucking with the boot floppies in CVS.
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 04:39:21AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> am i the only one who thinks `archetecture not supported' should come
> with a `I don't care' button? (yeah yeah one of these days i'll start
> mucking with the boot floppies in CVS..)
You're definitely not the only one.
And when *ar
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> assuming the linuxppc ramdisk has tar and gzip all you would really
> have to do is boot it, switch to VC two to get a shell and use
> mke2fs on all your partitions then mount them into place (say
> /tmp/root /tmp/root/usr etc) and then cd into /tmp/root
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 04:55:19AM -0600, Jefferson Provost wrote:
>
> Well, after a long night of lather, rinse, reboot, I tracked down the
> "missing disks" problem to BootX 1.1.3. Presumably it's incompatible with
> MacOS 9? Anyway, with music playing I couldn't hear that the disk was
> spinn
Well, after a long night of lather, rinse, reboot, I tracked down the
"missing disks" problem to BootX 1.1.3. Presumably it's incompatible with
MacOS 9? Anyway, with music playing I couldn't hear that the disk was
spinning down just before booting the kernel and never spinning back up
again. I
Hi,
I'm still trying to get an install on my Powerbook G3 (lombard).
After the debian installer failed with "architecture not supported," I
tried doing a linuxppc install, hoping to get a bootable system that I
could then wrangle into a debian system. Here's the tale...
First, the kernel that
11 matches
Mail list logo
