Hi guys,
Sorry to chime in late, but I was on holiday for two weeks, plus had my
primary mail laptop crash it's disk sortly before that
Anyways
On 17 Jan, this message from Dylan Beaudette echoed through cyberspace:
> On Monday 17 January 2005 08:54 am, Sean Jewett wrote:
>> On Sun, 16
Le lun 2005-01-17 a 11:57:23 -0500, Sean Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
>
> > I will try to get the planb driver working with a more modern kernel and
> > report back here when i have some spare time. also -- i am pretty sure that
> > the planb dr
On Monday 17 January 2005 01:16 pm, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> On Monday 17 January 2005 08:54 am, Sean Jewett wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> > > I will try to get the planb driver working with a more modern kernel
> > > and report back here when i have some spare time. also
On Monday 17 January 2005 01:16 pm, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> On Monday 17 January 2005 08:54 am, Sean Jewett wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> > > I will try to get the planb driver working with a more modern kernel
> > > and report back here when i have some spare time. also
On Monday 17 January 2005 08:54 am, Sean Jewett wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> > I will try to get the planb driver working with a more modern kernel and
> > report back here when i have some spare time. also -- i am pretty sure
> > that the planb driver needs the i2c subsys
On Monday 17 January 2005 08:54 am, Sean Jewett wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> > I will try to get the planb driver working with a more modern kernel and
> > report back here when i have some spare time. also -- i am pretty sure
> > that the planb driver needs the i2c subsys
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> I will try to get the planb driver working with a more modern kernel and
> report back here when i have some spare time. also -- i am pretty sure that
> the planb driver needs the i2c subsystem in order to function.
Well, I can confirm 2.4.27, I jus
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> I will try to get the planb driver working with a more modern kernel and
> report back here when i have some spare time. also -- i am pretty sure that
> the planb driver needs the i2c subsystem in order to function.
Well, I can confirm 2.4.27, I jus
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Sean Jewett wrote:
> Here's a dumb question... what is videodev ? It could be that I have it
> compiled in monolithic, I tend to stay away from modules if I know it's
> something I'm going to need loaded in one way or the other (for
> troubleshooting I did do planb as a modul
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Sean Jewett wrote:
> Here's a dumb question... what is videodev ? It could be that I have it
> compiled in monolithic, I tend to stay away from modules if I know it's
> something I'm going to need loaded in one way or the other (for
> troubleshooting I did do planb as a modul
First the camera does colour too but the quality sux ;)
ok heres some more info
nitro:~# cat /proc/video/dev/video0
name: Apple PlanB Video-In
type: VID_TYPE_CAPTURE|VID_TYPE_OVERLAY
hardware: 0x10
nitro:~# lsmod
Module Size Used byNot tainte
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, david wrote:
> success!
Egads! Now I'm feeling the pressure.
> after getting X to run locally I fired up xawtv without any options and
> saw pictures. Grabbed a few frames for posterity and made myself a cup
> of tea.
Looks like you shared a pict on your website! Awes
(I've cc'd v4l in case anyone has any info they'd like to add)
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> Well it has been a while since I have messed around with all of this... and
> it
> seems that the 'Ben' -series PPC kernel tree is no longer maintained...
FWIW, I have a 2.4.20 Ben ser
First the camera does colour too but the quality sux ;)
ok heres some more info
nitro:~# cat /proc/video/dev/video0
name: Apple PlanB Video-In
type: VID_TYPE_CAPTURE|VID_TYPE_OVERLAY
hardware: 0x10
nitro:~# lsmod
Module Size Used byNot tainted
m
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, david wrote:
> success!
Egads! Now I'm feeling the pressure.
> after getting X to run locally I fired up xawtv without any options and
> saw pictures. Grabbed a few frames for posterity and made myself a cup
> of tea.
Looks like you shared a pict on your website! Awes
(I've cc'd v4l in case anyone has any info they'd like to add)
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> Well it has been a while since I have messed around with all of this... and
> it
> seems that the 'Ben' -series PPC kernel tree is no longer maintained...
FWIW, I have a 2.4.20 Ben ser
success!
after getting X to run locally I fired up xawtv without any options and
saw pictures. Grabbed a few frames for posterity and made myself a cup
of tea.
The details
8600 ppc 350ev
320meg ram
Matrox Millenium 1 video card
Apple conference camera
kernel 2.4.19 (via apt-get) - compiled wi
On Sunday 16 January 2005 12:55 pm, david wrote:
> Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> >On Friday 14 January 2005 10:26 am, Sean Jewett wrote:
> >>Has anyone managed to get the planb driver to work (or better yet, with
> >>the v4l stuff)? If so, how? What kernel, what distro, what phase of the
> >>moon?
> >
success!
after getting X to run locally I fired up xawtv without any options and
saw pictures. Grabbed a few frames for posterity and made myself a cup
of tea.
The details
8600 ppc 350ev
320meg ram
Matrox Millenium 1 video card
Apple conference camera
kernel 2.4.19 (via apt-get) - compiled with
On Sunday 16 January 2005 12:55 pm, david wrote:
> Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> >On Friday 14 January 2005 10:26 am, Sean Jewett wrote:
> >>Has anyone managed to get the planb driver to work (or better yet, with
> >>the v4l stuff)? If so, how? What kernel, what distro, what phase of the
> >>moon?
> >
Sean Jewett wrote:
If you can get around this one:
ioctl: VIDIOCSCHAN(0,Composite,flags=0x0,type=2,norm=3): Invalid argument
You're a saint. Until you can get around that you won't have any joy.
According to v4l the problem lies in the driver (and seeing as v4l works
with a lot of other c
Sean Jewett wrote:
If you can get around this one:
ioctl: VIDIOCSCHAN(0,Composite,flags=0x0,type=2,norm=3): Invalid argument
You're a saint. Until you can get around that you won't have any joy.
According to v4l the problem lies in the driver (and seeing as v4l works
with a lot of other cards,
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, david wrote:
> Some progress with planb perhaps..
Unfortunately no, you're seeing what I've been seeing.
> i generated a 2.4.19 kernel from debian sources and enabled the planb
> module. dmesg seems to report this is ok but the xawtv side seems to
> remain problematic.
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, david wrote:
> Some progress with planb perhaps..
Unfortunately no, you're seeing what I've been seeing.
> i generated a 2.4.19 kernel from debian sources and enabled the planb
> module. dmesg seems to report this is ok but the xawtv side seems to
> remain problematic.
Hi all
Some progress with planb perhaps..
i generated a 2.4.19 kernel from debian sources and enabled the planb
module. dmesg seems to report this is ok but the xawtv side seems to
remain problematic.
i have made some notes on my weblog if you are interested...
http://nitro.qednet.biz/cgi-
Hi all
Some progress with planb perhaps..
i generated a 2.4.19 kernel from debian sources and enabled the planb
module. dmesg seems to report this is ok but the xawtv side seems to
remain problematic.
i have made some notes on my weblog if you are interested...
http://nitro.qednet.biz/cgi-bin/b
g'day all
I wrote to the list a couple of weeks ago about requirements for using
the video input capabilities on an AV mac, i did receive some nice
pointers including the reference to planB. As yet I haven't actually got
around to implementing the web cam (which is where I was generally
heade
g'day all
I wrote to the list a couple of weeks ago about requirements for using
the video input capabilities on an AV mac, i did receive some nice
pointers including the reference to planB. As yet I haven't actually got
around to implementing the web cam (which is where I was generally
headed)
On Friday 14 January 2005 10:26 am, Sean Jewett wrote:
> Has anyone managed to get the planb driver to work (or better yet, with
> the v4l stuff)? If so, how? What kernel, what distro, what phase of the
> moon?
Yes. I have a working planb setup on an 8500/250 604e machine, running a
custom comp
Le ven 2005-01-14 a 16:11:30 -0500, Sean Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> since v4l works with everything else) is fixed.
>
> Note, I spent an afternoon with a friend trying to hack the driver to no
> avail. It's not that we've not looked at the source or tried to fix the
> source. It jus
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, SR, ESC wrote:
> why are you bothering with 2.4.18? FYI, the kernel stuff on that site
> is ancient history.
Because I've tried every current 2.4 kernel to NO avail. At one point
2.4.18 w/ the patch worked (apparently) and because there is DOCUMENTATION
that states that 2
Le ven 2005-01-14 a 15:53:28 -0500, Sean Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
>
> Has anyone managed to get the planb driver to work (or better yet, with
> the v4l stuff)? If so, how? What kernel, what distro, what phase of the
> moon?
>
> I have beat my head with Debian and now Yellow Dog to no a
Has anyone managed to get the planb driver to work (or better yet, with
the v4l stuff)? If so, how? What kernel, what distro, what phase of the
moon?
I have beat my head with Debian and now Yellow Dog to no avail. My last
ditch effort was to install YDL 2.3 and then install the RPM's Michel
On Friday 14 January 2005 10:26 am, Sean Jewett wrote:
> Has anyone managed to get the planb driver to work (or better yet, with
> the v4l stuff)? If so, how? What kernel, what distro, what phase of the
> moon?
Yes. I have a working planb setup on an 8500/250 604e machine, running a
custom comp
Le ven 2005-01-14 a 16:11:30 -0500, Sean Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> since v4l works with everything else) is fixed.
>
> Note, I spent an afternoon with a friend trying to hack the driver to no
> avail. It's not that we've not looked at the source or tried to fix the
> source. It jus
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, SR, ESC wrote:
> why are you bothering with 2.4.18? FYI, the kernel stuff on that site
> is ancient history.
Because I've tried every current 2.4 kernel to NO avail. At one point
2.4.18 w/ the patch worked (apparently) and because there is DOCUMENTATION
that states that 2
Le ven 2005-01-14 a 15:53:28 -0500, Sean Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
>
> Has anyone managed to get the planb driver to work (or better yet, with
> the v4l stuff)? If so, how? What kernel, what distro, what phase of the
> moon?
>
> I have beat my head with Debian and now Yellow Dog to no a
Has anyone managed to get the planb driver to work (or better yet, with
the v4l stuff)? If so, how? What kernel, what distro, what phase of the
moon?
I have beat my head with Debian and now Yellow Dog to no avail. My last
ditch effort was to install YDL 2.3 and then install the RPM's Michel
38 matches
Mail list logo