On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 08:54:40PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> :)
>
> But I wonder if that's even necessary? When setting up a Sony cam for my gf's
> father, I just had to install the standard Windoze USB mass storage drivers
> and it worked - does this imply the cam uses FAT? Or some kind o
Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Granted. So we can use digital cameras as portable storage - where's the
> camfs ?
Actually, gphoto2 has a gnome-vfs plugin so any and all suppored cameras can be
browsed and have files drag-and-dropped from them (though not sure about to all
of them) right in Nautilus.
Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> > > Granted. So we can use digital cameras as portable storage - where's the
> > > camfs ?
> >
> > :)
> >
> > But I wonder if that's even necessary? When setting up a Sony cam for my
> > gf's father, I just had to install the standard Windoze USB mass storage
> > drivers
> > Granted. So we can use digital cameras as portable storage - where's the
> > camfs ?
>
> :)
>
> But I wonder if that's even necessary? When setting up a Sony cam for my gf's
> father, I just had to install the standard Windoze USB mass storage drivers
> and it worked - does this imply the cam
Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> > > So does a camera really qualify as a mass storage device then?
> >
> > Some do, I was also amazed by that. And it makes a lot of sense too, you
> > can just copy the files to and from.
>
> Granted. So we can use digital cameras as portable storage - where's the
> ca
> > So does a camera really qualify as a mass storage device then?
>
> Some do, I was also amazed by that. And it makes a lot of sense too, you can
> just copy the files to and from.
Granted. So we can use digital cameras as portable storage - where's the
camfs ?
Which LUN does represent the stor
Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> > > most of the time. And just fine on my Lombard all of the time. That's
> > > with a 250MB Zip drive on the bus and nothing else, and building the
> > > uhci or usb-uhci drivers as modules instead of builtin seemed to help a
> > > lot with stablity for some reason.
> >
> > most of the time. And just fine on my Lombard all of the time. That's with
> > a 250MB Zip drive on the bus and nothing else, and building the uhci or
> > usb-uhci drivers as modules instead of builtin seemed to help a lot with
> > stablity for some reason.
>
> interesting, in my case the devic
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 09:59:54PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > I've applied the patch to usb-storage.c and compiled and inserted it, but
> > > I
> > > seem to be having trouble with scsi emulation still. When I try 'mount -t
> > > vfat /dev/sda /mnt' I get:
> >
> > usb mass storage does n
> > I've applied the patch to usb-storage.c and compiled and inserted it, but I
> > seem to be having trouble with scsi emulation still. When I try 'mount -t
> > vfat /dev/sda /mnt' I get:
>
> usb mass storage does not work under 2.2 kernels AFAIK. i tried it
> for quite awhile and finally gave u
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 01:10:14PM +1100, Mark Hepburn wrote:
> Hi, I'm running 2.2r2, kernel 2.2.1pre20-ben3 and I'm trying to get my imation
> LS-120 superdrive to work (on my revA imac)
>
> I've applied the patch to usb-storage.c and compiled and inserted it, but I
> seem to be having trouble w
Hi, I'm running 2.2r2, kernel 2.2.1pre20-ben3 and I'm trying to get my imation
LS-120 superdrive to work (on my revA imac)
I've applied the patch to usb-storage.c and compiled and inserted it, but I
seem to be having trouble with scsi emulation still. When I try 'mount -t
vfat /dev/sda /mnt' I ge
12 matches
Mail list logo
