Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > most of the time. And just fine on my Lombard all of the time. That's > > > with a 250MB Zip drive on the bus and nothing else, and building the > > > uhci or usb-uhci drivers as modules instead of builtin seemed to help a > > > lot with stablity for some reason. > > > > interesting, in my case the device is a digital camera that shows up > > as a mass storage device. under 2.2 kernels the kernel recognizes the > > device but never allocates a node to it, under 2.4 it works the same > > except the device is allocated /dev/sda. i messed with it for a very > > So does a camera really qualify as a mass storage device then?
Some do, I was also amazed by that. And it makes a lot of sense too, you can just copy the files to and from. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project member
