[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> KDE 1.1.2 seems to build ok here on a G3, using the latest gcc and
> binutils. In fact, u can check the compiled debs on
This is because you used 1.1.2-19990906, I had 1.1.2-19990901. I will try to
recompile 0906.
--
Frank Petzold, IBM Zurich Research Laboratory,
KDE 1.1.2 seems to build ok here on a G3, using the latest gcc and
binutils. In fact, u can check the compiled debs on
ftp://ftp.eq.uc.pt/pub/software/unix/Linux/other/potato/
Regards,
Nuno.
> > > huh? if the package is called kdebase...doesn't it automatically provide
> > > kdebase???
> >
> > huh? if the package is called kdebase...doesn't it automatically provide
> > kdebase???
>
> I think it provides kdebase-1.1.1 only. Yes, -1.1., not -1.1.2 I will
> have a look into it this evening.
strange...hmm...ok.
> > this has to be a ppc thing since it works for i386,sparc,alpha...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > There seems to be a dependancy problem in 1.1.2, though. It installed, but
> > gave me errors. It seems kdebase-1.1.2 does not provide "kdebase", on which
>
> > other packages depend.
>
> huh? if the package is called kdebase...doesn't it automatically provide
> k
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 08:14:53AM +0200, Frank Petzold wrote:
> Yesterday, after upgrading to the new gcc and binutils, I finally managed to
> compile kdebase-1.1.2. I am currently compiling the other packages.
>
> There seems to be a dependancy problem in 1.1.2, though. It installed, but
> gav
Yesterday, after upgrading to the new gcc and binutils, I finally managed to
compile kdebase-1.1.2. I am currently compiling the other packages.
There seems to be a dependancy problem in 1.1.2, though. It installed, but
gave me errors. It seems kdebase-1.1.2 does not provide "kdebase", on which
6 matches
Mail list logo
