jtv wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:08:31PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
>> This leaves you free to create derivates, but means that you can't
pollute
>> the standard.
>>
>
> Going by what little I've seen of C#, Eiffel# etc., Microsoft now
> seems to have gone this way, calling their
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:08:31PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
>
> Likewise, you could include a clause like that in the license... "you
> may not use the name java blah blah blah unless you pass all our tests
> and meet approval and so on and so forth blah blah blah".
They did. It's one of t
"Jonathan Belson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From an objective point of view, how could Sun have stopped
> Microsoft from distributing their non-standard JDK (ie. produces
> non-portable code by default) if they hadn't kept ownership of Java?
Simple - like Apache does:
You can't make a deriva
EMail from "Lorenzo De Vito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to
with message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:59:28 +0200 Lorenzo De Vito wrote:
> What's the better way to run Java on DebianPPC ? I've looked for Java 2 on
> www.sun.com but I've found
Hiya
> > You can't redistribute it in binary form unless it's been approved
> > by Sun, since they want to ensure that distributed versions are
> > standards-compliant (and make money in the process - no suprises there).
> >
> > >From an objective point of view, how could Sun have stopped Micr
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Jonathan Belson wrote:
> > > is this a "political" issue or is there just no maintainer for JAVA
> > > packages?
> >
> > Sun's Java implementation is proprietary software. You can't even
> > redistribute it, much less improve it and share it with your friends,
> > like you ca
Colin Walters wrote:
is this a "political" issue or is there just no maintainer for JAVA
packages?
Sun's Java implementation is proprietary software. You can't even
redistribute it, much less improve it and share it with your friends,
like you can the rest of Debian.
That being said though,
Hiya
> > is this a "political" issue or is there just no maintainer for JAVA
> > packages?
>
> Sun's Java implementation is proprietary software. You can't even
> redistribute it, much less improve it and share it with your friends,
> like you can the rest of Debian.
You can't redistribute it
> is this a "political" issue or is there just no maintainer for JAVA
> packages?
Sun's Java implementation is proprietary software. You can't even
redistribute it, much less improve it and share it with your friends,
like you can the rest of Debian.
That being said though, there was some discu
"Lorenzo De Vito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What's the better way to run Java on DebianPPC ? I've looked for
> Java 2 on www.sun.com but I've found only versions for x86 or Sparc.
> There is good compatibility with LinuxPPC Java Version and that
&
> Anyway go look at www.blackdown.org or any mirror (such as
> mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/java-linux) for the 1.3.1 java for ppc linux.
> There are no debs, but the tarball is fine.
Hi,
is this a "political" issue or is there just no maintainer for JAVA packages?
mfg Fabian
--
echo -e '#!/bin/sh
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 05:59:28PM +0200, Lorenzo De Vito wrote:
> What's the better way to run Java on DebianPPC ? I've looked for Java 2 on
> www.sun.com but I've found only versions for x86 or Sparc.
> There is good compatibility with LinuxPPC Java Version and that
What's the better way to run Java on DebianPPC ? I've looked for Java 2 on
www.sun.com but I've found only versions for x86 or Sparc.
There is good compatibility with LinuxPPC Java Version and that distribuited
from Sun? There are debian packages ?
13 matches
Mail list logo
