[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Hello! thanks for taking care of making those debs, that's nice. I
> just tried Dl them, but it seems you forgot to make the Packages.gz
> list. Therefore apt-get does not work (ast least on my machine)
Rather, I messed up the symlink between woody and unstable when I co
Hello!
thanks for taking care of making those debs, that's nice. I just tried
Dl them, but it seems you forgot to make the Packages.gz list. Therefore
apt-get does not work (ast least on my machine)
this is what I get:
Failed to fetch
http://southpole.penguinpowered.com/debian/dists/unstable/main/b
Here they are, the powerpc debs of helix gnome 1.2
Just add the following line to you /etc/apt/sources.list, apt-get update and
then apt-get install task-helix-gnome
deb http://southpole.penguinpowered.com/debian unstable main
these debs work fine with potato as well (well, actually I've
Just a quick update, I have the beast built, it seems to work find, I will get
the debs uploaded somewhere (hopefully apt-get-able) real soon.
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 05:00:10PM -0400, Kevin Puetz wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > ask Dan, he seems to know all about the build daemons. they are
> > definitly improving over what they were a couple months ago, but still
> > seem to trip over some things.
> > Don't ask me. Dbuild is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> ask Dan, he seems to know all about the build daemons. they are
> definitly improving over what they were a couple months ago, but still
> seem to trip over some things.
> Don't ask me. Dbuild is a whole other mess.
so you build all the ppc packages manually with ap
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 08:31:06PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> ask Dan, he seems to know all about the build daemons. they are
> definitly improving over what they were a couple months ago, but still
> seem to trip over some things.
Don't ask me. Dbuild is a whole other mess.
Dan
/---
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:03:05PM -0400, Kevin Puetz wrote:
> Actually, they do have linuxPPC RPM's it's just the debs that are i386 only.
> I
how offensive! ;-) once you get the powerpc debs built be sure to
pass on the info to them they seem committed to building proper debian
compliant de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> that would indeed be a good thing to do, the helix guys seem to be
> interested in doing these debs right so maybe if you get them built
> they will make them available. i would guess they don't have access
> to any non-intel hardware which would explain the intel only bi
"EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
EB> that would indeed be a good thing to do, the helix guys
EB> seem to be interested in doing these debs right so maybe if
EB> you get them built they will make them available. i would
EB> guess they don't have access to any non-intel
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 08:58:06PM -0400, Kevin Puetz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > if they have source debs and assuming there is no portability bugs a
> > simple apt-get source helix-whatever and a dpkg-buildpackage should do
> > the trick (or apt-get -b source)
>
> > i think they have th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> if they have source debs and assuming there is no portability bugs a
> simple apt-get source helix-whatever and a dpkg-buildpackage should do
> the trick (or apt-get -b source)
> i think they have thier page setup so its aptable no?
yes, they have apt-getable source deb
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 11:40:29PM -0400, Kevin Puetz wrote:
> Is anyone working on making powerpc debs of the new helix gnome 1.2? I see
> that they have source and x86 binaries on their site, so if nobody else is
> I'm
> going to take a shot at building them up, but I don&#x
Is anyone working on making powerpc debs of the new helix gnome 1.2? I see
that they have source and x86 binaries on their site, so if nobody else is I'm
going to take a shot at building them up, but I don't want to duplicate effort
if it's already taken care of.
14 matches
Mail list logo
