On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:30:42AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Mozilla is still kind of a native X app while MOL will probably shove
> > pixmaps
> > over the wire like hell. X isn't very effective for that. Might be better
> > over
> > SSH with compr
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:30:42AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> Mozilla is still kind of a native X app while MOL will probably shove pixmaps
> over the wire like hell. X isn't very effective for that. Might be better over
> SSH with compression.
my test *was* over ssh with compression ;-)
--
Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:52:03AM -0700, Tovar wrote:
> >
> > It works great on the local X server, an amazing hack! It just doesn't
> > work remotely, probably because of the bitmap mapping magic to achieve
> > X Windows compatability. I'm not complaining it not working
MacOS needs its own separate address. Alternately you can set up linux to
proxy for mol via an ethertap device.
I think i have 'ethertap' compiled into my 2.4.1 kernel, but just
setting the IP address to a locally unused one made it come up just
fine. Even Netscape works (with or without
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:52:03AM -0700, Tovar wrote:
>
> It works great on the local X server, an amazing hack! It just doesn't
> work remotely, probably because of the bitmap mapping magic to achieve
> X Windows compatability. I'm not complaining it not working, i would
> just like to have s
On 22 Apr 2001, Tovar wrote:
> Ah - maybe you accessed through AppleShare, and TCP/IP didn't
> work? It seems that DHCP is not reliable when used from both
> Linux and Mac - try adding your IP manually in either system.
>
> Correct. It's already manually configured and works with the
I'd never expect any success in running pre-compiled binaries made for
other distributions. Dependencies are usually not as strictly managed
in RPM's and even when thy are they obviously depend on libraries, not
the package names used in Debian.
-- Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PRO
Citat Tovar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Alas, you still have to have just the right kernel and/or other
> packages
> installed to run the pre-compiled binaries under a (custom) Debian 2.4.1
I'd never expect any success in running pre-compiled binaries made for other
distributions. Dependencies are us
In the 0.9.57 announcement they talk about less dependency on the kernel -
wonder if that will help for these issues? They say 'it might be necessary to
recompile MOL from the source in certain cases' for 2.4 kernels...
-- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTE
9 matches
Mail list logo
