Re: Feedback on patch to PowerPC ports pmac page requested

2005-10-23 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 10:33:32AM -0700, Shyamal Prasad wrote: > So perhaps the statement needs to be something like > > "For users of the powerpc flavour a 2.4 kernel is also provided to > support Amiga Power-UP (apus) systems, and as a fall back for users > with external kernel modules that are

Re: Feedback on patch to PowerPC ports pmac page requested

2005-10-23 Thread Shyamal Prasad
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sven> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 07:24:23PM -0700, Shyamal Prasad Sven> wrote: >> the G4) you also have the option of choosing a 2.4 kernel in >> case your hardware is really old. However most hardware built >> after 2001 sho

Re: Feedback on patch to PowerPC ports pmac page requested

2005-10-23 Thread Shyamal Prasad
> "Rogério" == Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rogério> On Oct 22 2005, Shyamal Prasad wrote: >> as +little as 600 to 700M for a really basic system, but you'll Rogério> I question the 600 to 700M figures for a "really basic Rogério> system". I think that these numbe

Re: Feedback on patch to PowerPC ports pmac page requested

2005-10-22 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 07:24:23PM -0700, Shyamal Prasad wrote: > > Hi all, > > http://www.us.debian.org/ports/powerpc/inst/pmac is quite out of > date. I use new Mac hardware (G5), and have little experience with > minimal installs of Debian since potato. Comments on the patch below > would be a

Re: Feedback on patch to PowerPC ports pmac page requested

2005-10-22 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello, On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 07:24:23PM -0700, Shyamal Prasad wrote: > http://www.us.debian.org/ports/powerpc/inst/pmac is quite out of > date. I use new Mac hardware (G5), and have little experience with > minimal installs of Debian since potato. Comments on the patch below > would be appreciate

Re: Feedback on patch to PowerPC ports pmac page requested

2005-10-22 Thread Rogério Brito
On Oct 22 2005, Shyamal Prasad wrote: > +1G is probably a realistic minimum disk space required for an > +experimental Linux system. You might get by with less, perhaps as > +little as 600 to 700M for a really basic system, but you'll more than > +likely want more than just the basics. I question

Feedback on patch to PowerPC ports pmac page requested

2005-10-22 Thread Shyamal Prasad
Hi all, http://www.us.debian.org/ports/powerpc/inst/pmac is quite out of date. I use new Mac hardware (G5), and have little experience with minimal installs of Debian since potato. Comments on the patch below would be appreciated. I will send this to debian-www after any corrections that might be

Feedback and thanks

2003-11-11 Thread Lars Noodén
In late 2002, I set up and customized conferencing[1] software on Debian GNU/Linux 3, an old PPC 7600 and with much help from folks on the list, both directly and via the archive. I would like to say a proper thank you. It allowed several classes of students to make and participate in web-b

New kernel-patch-benh package - feedback appreciated

2003-10-04 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, I've just created, tested and uploaded a new version of the official kernel-patch-benh package that corresponds to 2.4.22-ben2. I would appreciate feedback on the package in general, and in particular on its main features over Ben's tree proper, which are: * applies to the tree

Re: #166841: feedback needed

2003-03-01 Thread Nicolai Langfeldt
Alastair McKinstry wrote: Hi, I'm the console-tools maintainer, trying to close #166841: which gives the wrong keymap to non-English (in particular French) PPC users. I suspect this bug to be solved by previous uploads; can anyone without a "default" keyboard please confirm that this bug exists

#166841: feedback needed

2003-03-01 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi, I'm the console-tools maintainer, trying to close #166841: which gives the wrong keymap to non-English (in particular French) PPC users. I suspect this bug to be solved by previous uploads; can anyone without a "default" keyboard please confirm that this bug exists/does not exist? Regards, A

Re: FEEDBACK WANTED: What to do about XF86Config-4 BusID?

2001-08-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
Branden Robinson wrote: > 1) add a BusID question to the templates > 2) add the following logic to the .config script: > (this is psuedocode, don't sweat the syntax, please) > > if arch == powerpc: > FOO=$(lspci | grep VGA) > switch (wc -l $FOO) > case 0: prob

Re: FEEDBACK WANTED: What to do about XF86Config-4 BusID?

2001-07-20 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > With your 4.1.0 from two weeks or so back, I didn't have to specify a > > busid at all. Rage LT Pro, not 128. > > Well, I had to for 0pre1v5. Maybe the atimisc driver has more brains that > the r128 driver... Maybe. I've not upgraded lately, maybe atimisc now also gets it wrong. > > It se

Re: FEEDBACK WANTED: What to do about XF86Config-4 BusID?

2001-07-20 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 05:09:22PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > It's not a question of whether it's useful, it's a question of whether it's > > NECESSARY. I haven't heard reports about any other architecture > > *requiring* an explicit BusID in the XF86Config-4 file for the server to > > work

Re: FEEDBACK WANTED: What to do about XF86Config-4 BusID?

2001-07-20 Thread Michael Schmitz
> It's not a question of whether it's useful, it's a question of whether it's > NECESSARY. I haven't heard reports about any other architecture > *requiring* an explicit BusID in the XF86Config-4 file for the server to > work. If that proves to be the case, I'll add them to the list. With your 4

Re: FEEDBACK WANTED: What to do about XF86Config-4 BusID?

2001-07-20 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, Branden Robinson writes: > A BusID was mandatory, and my debconf questions don't handle that > yet. Having UseFBDev on or off seemed to be harmless either way. On my Pismo, it's the other way round. Contrary to 4.0.3, the 4.1.0 X server works nicely without a BusID. However, it requires t

Re: FEEDBACK WANTED: What to do about XF86Config-4 BusID?

2001-07-20 Thread Sven
on i386. > Anyway, my debconf templates are intended only to get the majority of > configurations working. That means single-head usage. Anything more is > icing. Sure, but you asked for feedback. > > Especially for multi-function devices. > > Did you not see the part a

Re: FEEDBACK WANTED: What to do about XF86Config-4 BusID?

2001-07-20 Thread Branden Robinson
vices show up as performing the same function. > I admit they are not that common, but still it would be nice to have the > same handling also for these cases., especially in the case >1 bus > entries. Does anyone have any USEFUL feedback? -- G. Branden Robinson| C

Re: FEEDBACK WANTED: What to do about XF86Config-4 BusID?

2001-07-20 Thread Sven
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 02:22:57AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I got a head on my G3 tonight and ate some of my own dog food as far as the > X server goes. > > Linux redwald 2.2.18pre21 #1 Mon Nov 20 21:18:03 EST 2000 ppc unknown > xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 > > It has a Rage 128 RE. A B

FEEDBACK WANTED: What to do about XF86Config-4 BusID?

2001-07-20 Thread Branden Robinson
I got a head on my G3 tonight and ate some of my own dog food as far as the X server goes. Linux redwald 2.2.18pre21 #1 Mon Nov 20 21:18:03 EST 2000 ppc unknown xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 It has a Rage 128 RE. A BusID was mandatory, and my debconf questions don't handle that yet. Having UseF

Feedback on today's linux-pmac-stable

2000-10-25 Thread Sergio Brandano
Hi, the kernel boot seems ok up to the automount of the local partitions, where it hangs when mounting the MAC (8.6) partition. The filesystem type is in the kernel. Sergio

Feedback

2000-07-01 Thread Sergio Brandano
Hi, This is some feedback on the latest distribution when using my PowerBook 1999. Kernel: I am still using 2.2.15pre20. This is because today's rsync tree, that I compiled as usual, does recognize the InfraRed on /dev/ttyS1 (I can see it with ifconfig), but it does not recognize

Re: feedback

2000-06-18 Thread David Brown
On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Sergio Brandano wrote: > - Kernel 2.2.16 does not want to boot on Lombard I was unable to boot 2.2.16 when I first tried. I re-rsync'd with Paulus' archive and it now boots. Something was definately fixed. Dave Brown

feedback

2000-06-18 Thread Sergio Brandano
Hi, - Kernel 2.2.16 does not want to boot on Lombard - pmud package: great job!!! - firewire: how to? Sergio

Re: Feedback (2000-03-16)

2000-03-17 Thread Sergio Brandano
Andrew B. Arthur wrote: >>- bogomips: 801.18 (PowerBook Lombard 400Mhz) >> bogomips from the xterm reports: 526 > >I haven't seen that bug before. Seems strange to me since doesn't GNOME >get it the same way? At any rate I don't use GNOME currently, so I >wouldn't really know. The 800b

Re: Feedback (2000-03-16)

2000-03-16 Thread Andrew B. Arthur
Sergio Brandano wrote: > > Cheers, > Sergio > > (hardware: PowerBook Lombard G3-400) > > 1. Result of booting today's rsync tree: > > Machine check in kernel mode. (regs at cb491bf0) > Caused by (from srr1): Unknown values in srr1 > NIP: D081332C XER: 2000 LR: D0813318 REGS: cb491bf0 TRA

Feedback (2000-03-16)

2000-03-16 Thread Sergio Brandano
Cheers, Sergio (hardware: PowerBook Lombard G3-400) 1. Result of booting today's rsync tree: Machine check in kernel mode. (regs at cb491bf0) Caused by (from srr1): Unknown values in srr1 NIP: D081332C XER: 2000 LR: D0813318 REGS: cb491bf0 TRAP: 0200 MSR: 1030 [IRDRME] TASK = cb4900

More feedback (4)

2000-02-23 Thread Sergio Brandano
- irda-common: running dpkg --pending --configure ... running dpkg --pending --remove ... (Reading database ... 121912 files and directories currently installed.) Removing irda-common ... Stopping IrDA Manager: dpkg: error processing irda-common (--remove): subprocess pre-removal script retur

Re: More feedback

2000-02-22 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Sergio Brandano wrote: > Hi, > > - irda: postinst failure > - swiprolog: the trace triggers an error (see below) > - apmd: not supported > - what is supported then? > - It would be a good thing to add proper help > in the kernel APM section. > - the HD of my Lombard does not want to sle

Re: More feedback (2)

2000-02-19 Thread Sergio Brandano
Logan Hall wrote: >Latest nmap works on my biege G3 for localhost (127.0.0.1) but not for my >chosen hostname (allanon), is this the same problem you are getting? In my case (Lombard), nmap hangs in both situations. Sergio

Re: More feedback (2)

2000-02-19 Thread Logan Hall
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Sergio Brandano wrote: > > Furthermore: > > - pcmcia: any support for it? > - nmap: it (still) does not work on localhost Latest nmap works on my biege G3 for localhost (127.0.0.1) but not for my chosen hostname (allanon), is this the same problem you are getting? > -

More feedback (2)

2000-02-19 Thread Sergio Brandano
(sorry) - how do I monitor the battery status? it would be nice if one of those panel applet would work, possibly advising about the time that is left and the eventual urge to shut-down immediately (which is of paramount importance). Sergio

More feedback (2)

2000-02-19 Thread Sergio Brandano
Furthermore: - pcmcia: any support for it? - nmap: it (still) does not work on localhost - gnu-prolog: not yet available on ppc (why?) - festival: (still) not available on ppc (why?) Cheers, Sergio

More feedback

2000-02-19 Thread Sergio Brandano
Hi, - irda: postinst failure - swiprolog: the trace triggers an error (see below) - apmd: not supported - what is supported then? - It would be a good thing to add proper help in the kernel APM section. - the HD of my Lombard does not want to sleep for more than a few seconds, alth

Feedback on swiprolog

2000-02-17 Thread Sergio Brandano
Hi, swiprolog on Deibian ppc, current versions, generates the following error message when triggering the trace: Sergio --- Welcome to SWI-Prolog (Version 3.3.0) Copyright (c) 1993-1999 University of Amsterdam. All rights reserved. For help, use ?- help(Topic). or ?- apropos(Word). 1 ?-

feedback on Kernel 2.2.15pre for the Lombard

2000-02-11 Thread Sergio Brandano
The rsync source-tree now compiles, but the machine does not survive the bootstrap (I am using BootX). Sergio

Re: feedback on speak-freely for Debian ppc (next release)

2000-02-11 Thread Kevin Puetz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > The package currently distributed is 6.1, although 7.1 > was made available long ago. Version 6.1 does not work > on my laptop (Apple Lombad), so I tried 7.1, compiling > it with the big endian option. After opening a loopback > connection, I got the following error

feedback on speak-freely for Debian ppc (next release)

2000-02-11 Thread Sergio Brandano
The package currently distributed is 6.1, although 7.1 was made available long ago. Version 6.1 does not work on my laptop (Apple Lombad), so I tried 7.1, compiling it with the big endian option. After opening a loopback connection, I got the following error from the program: -- ERROR: sfmik

feedback on 2.2.15

2000-01-25 Thread Sergio Brandano
When compiling Paul's rsync tree on my Lombard, I get what follows: gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -D__powerpc__ -fsigned-char -msoft-float -pipe -fno-builtin -ffixed-r2 -Wno-uninitialized -mmultiple -mstring