Am 29.10.2013 17:48, schrieb Ian Jackson:
> (Mind you, I have my doubts about a process which counts people
> promising to do work - it sets up some rather unfortunate incentives.
> I guess it's easier to judge and more prospective than a process which
> attempts to gauge whether the work has been
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Well, I did ask for the creation of port-specific tags back at
> debconf8 (if I'm not mistaken), but you told me to go for usertags
> instead ;-)
Sounds familiar. Usertags have the advantage of not requiring me to do
any work. But presumably at the tim
Hi,
On 05/11/13 18:50, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> This sounds like a case where we should turn these usertags into fully
>> fledged tags. [Or alternatively, they should just be made usertags under
>> the debian-po...@lists.debian.org user or similar.]
Eith
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > In this regard; I am guilty of filing some those bugs without tagging
> > them. Honestly, adding the tags get a bit in the way right now. If a
> > package FTBFS on 4 architectures, I have to dig up 3-4 differ
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Niels Thykier wrote:
> In this regard; I am guilty of filing some those bugs without tagging
> them. Honestly, adding the tags get a bit in the way right now. If a
> package FTBFS on 4 architectures, I have to dig up 3-4 different
> usertags (with different "user") and associat
Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Potential issues for most ports (Was: Re: Bits from
the Release Team (Jessie freeze info))"):
> On 2013-11-03 16:03, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=jessie_or_sid&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&kfreeb
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:53:05AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [1] I certainly wouldn't have space for something like this:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Z800_2066_JKU.jpeg
>
> (and much less the money. Yeah I know that is technically not an s390,
> but as I understand it, an s390 sho
On 2013-11-03 23:04, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:54:34AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> [...]
>
>> I suppose a "sponsor-only" DD could be sufficient, provided that the
>> sponsor knows the porters well enough to be willing to sign off on e.g.
>> access to porter boxes. I gu
On 2013-11-03 16:03, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 03/11/13 10:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Come to think of it; maybe we should have a BTS page for each of the
>> ports (e.g. a pseudo package in the BTS).
>
> We've had this on kfreebsd, due it to having been a release goal:
>
> http://udd.debian
On 03/11/13 10:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Come to think of it; maybe we should have a BTS page for each of the
> ports (e.g. a pseudo package in the BTS).
We've had this on kfreebsd, due it to having been a release goal:
http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=jessie_or_sid&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:54:34AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-10-29 17:48, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze
> > info)"):
> >> [...]
> >> As mentioned we are debating whether the
Niels Thykier dixit:
>Then there are more concrete things like ruby's test suite seg. faulting
>on ia64 (#593141), ld seg. faulting with --as-needed on ia64
And only statically linked klibc-compiled executables work on IA64,
not dynamically linked ones. I’ve looked into it, but Itanic is so
massi
On 2013-10-29 17:48, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)"):
>> [...]
>> As mentioned we are debating whether the "5 DDs" requirement still makes
>> sense. Would you say that we should abolish the
Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)"):
> On 2013-10-29 16:05, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I'm keen that Debian should continue to support a wide range of
> > architectures. Would it help if I, as a DD, volunteered to spon
On 2013-10-29 16:05, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Niels Thykier writes ("Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)"):
>> Results of porter roll-call
>> ===
> ...
>> Summary table:
>> Arch
Niels Thykier writes ("Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)"):
> Results of porter roll-call
> ===
...
> Summary table:
> Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
> - ---++-++-++---++--
> arme
Hi Peter,
Quoting peter green (2013-10-27 01:11:24)
> Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Until these two issues are fixed we will not be able to get an algorithmic
> > answer to the question of what constitutes the minimum required set of
> > packages.
> >
> There is also the complication of what I wi
Johannes Schauer wrote:
Until these two issues are fixed we will not be able to get an algorithmic
answer to the question of what constitutes the minimum required set of
packages.
There is also the complication of what I will call "non-key self
building compilers". fpc is an example
These a
Johannes Schauer (2013-10-26):
> (I was not able to find the debian-ports list on lists.debian.org (so I
> subscribed via email) did I just miss it?)
Dead list: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ports/
AFAICT it's now an alias for all debian-$port lists.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Di
Hi,
(I was not able to find the debian-ports list on lists.debian.org (so I
subscribed via email) did I just miss it?)
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (2013-10-23 22:04:59)
> I had a play with the 'botch' tool (see description[1]) for determining build
> order when bootstrapping an architecture.
botc
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013, Stewart Smith wrote:
> Jenkins can have slaves on remote hosts, via SSH. It runs a small java
> app there, so as long as the arch has a JVM then you're pretty right.
that JVM is not even needed, just schedule jobs via ssh and be done.
cheers,
Holger
Steven Chamberlain dixit:
>Come to think of it, it must take a day or more for m68k to rebuild
>eglibc. This is a more serious problem than resources needed by
Kernel takes a day now (on the fastest VMs), eglibc 3 days,
gcc 5 days (since gcj got folded into it; add another day or
so once gnat wi
On 23/10/13 12:55, Stewart Smith wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Stewart Smith
>> wrote:
>>> Jenkins can have slaves on remote hosts, via SSH. It runs a small java
>>> app there, so as long as the arch has a JVM then you're pretty right.
>>
>> For whatever
Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Stewart Smith
> wrote:
>> Jenkins can have slaves on remote hosts, via SSH. It runs a small java
>> app there, so as long as the arch has a JVM then you're pretty right.
>
> For whatever definition of small. I've seen it consuming 1 G
On 22/10/13 23:36, Stewart Smith wrote:
> Jenkins can have slaves on remote hosts, via SSH. It runs a small java
> app there, so as long as the arch has a JVM then you're pretty right.
That may be useful to set up on some arches, for things where Jenkins
needs direct control over CPU-intensive tas
Small is 64m ram not 256m. I just woke up and was catching up on things. My
apologies.
On Oct 23, 2013 7:20 AM, "Britt Dodd" wrote:
> I run Jenkins at my job. Small is around 256mb. Plus the Jenkins server
> can sit on a high-memory machine and the agent just sit on a 68k box doing
> builds. Smal
I run Jenkins at my job. Small is around 256mb. Plus the Jenkins server can
sit on a high-memory machine and the agent just sit on a 68k box doing
builds. Small is like 64M ram. You Amiga/Atari guys seem to have oodles of
ram to work with Lol.
On Oct 23, 2013 2:45 AM, "Geert Uytterhoeven" wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Stewart Smith
wrote:
> Jenkins can have slaves on remote hosts, via SSH. It runs a small java
> app there, so as long as the arch has a JVM then you're pretty right.
For whatever definition of small. I've seen it consuming 1 GiB of memory...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> On 21/10/13 16:42, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I would love for us to have an automated system to give us a
>> "weather-report" on the toolchain for each architecture. It would be
>> nice both for us to see how ports are doing and for porters to spot and
>> fix problems e
Hi Niels,
This was quite interesting as it seems to tie in with some other
projects that are already being pursued...
On 21/10/13 16:42, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I would love for us to have an automated system to give us a
> "weather-report" on the toolchain for each architecture. It would be
> ni
On 2013-10-19 16:38, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> [snip freeze policy]
>
Hi,
I s/-arm/-ports/'ed the CC, since I figured the rest of the porters
would find the answer equally interesting.
>> Results of porter roll-c
31 matches
Mail list logo
