On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Niels Thykier wrote: > > In this regard; I am guilty of filing some those bugs without tagging > > them. Honestly, adding the tags get a bit in the way right now. If a > > package FTBFS on 4 architectures, I have to dig up 3-4 different > > usertags (with different "user") and associate it with the bug. > > This sounds like a case where we should turn these usertags into fully > fledged tags. [Or alternatively, they should just be made usertags under > the debian-po...@lists.debian.org user or similar.]
I would also be OK with creating a pseudopackage as well as Ian suggested. [Or multiple pseudopackages.] Something like i386.ports.debian.org or similar would work, with each current port getting a pseudopackage, and the maintainer of the pseudopackage being the ports list. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com America was far better suited to be the World's Movie Star. The world's tequila-addled pro-league bowler. The world's acerbic bi-polar stand-up comedian. Anything but a somber and tedious nation of socially responsible centurions. -- Bruce Sterling, _Distraction_ p122 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131105185031.gz9...@rzlab.ucr.edu
