Re: About r-base on the powerpc.

1999-03-04 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Thu, 04 Mar 1999, Douglas Bates wrote: >I just uploaded a pre-release version of the r-base_0.63.3 package to > master.debian.org:~bates/r-base_0.63.3* I can't seem to be able to locate the folder. Could you please confirm the address? -- Konsta

Re: About r-base on the powerpc.

1999-03-04 Thread Douglas Bates
> "KM" == Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KM> On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote: >> Ahh, thats the problem! >> >> It isn't defined for glibc-2.1 anymore. Also not on i386. This is >> the fpu_control.h for i386: (for glibc-2.1; the reason is maybe >> t

Re: About r-base on the powerpc.

1999-02-26 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote: >Ahh, thats the problem! > >It isn't defined for glibc-2.1 anymore. Also not on i386. This >is the fpu_control.h for i386: (for glibc-2.1; the reason is maybe >the IEEE stuff) So, what do we do now for this? I suppose

Re: About r-base on the powerpc.

1999-02-25 Thread Hartmut Koptein
> On an Intel system __setfpucw is defined in > /usr/include/fpu_control.h > I'm not sure about the powerpc. Ahh, thats the problem! It isn't defined for glibc-2.1 anymore. Also not on i386. This is the fpu_control.h for i386: (for glibc-2.1; the reason is maybe the IEEE stuff) /* FPU control

Re: About r-base on the powerpc.

1999-02-25 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- (answering both at once) On Thu, 25 Feb 1999, Douglas Bates wrote: > Hartmut> Hmmm, don't remember such case ... could you try > Hartmut> -msoft-float ? Different libm packages for libc-2.0 and > Hartmut> libc-2.1 ??? Please grep also the kernel source for

Re: About r-base on the powerpc.

1999-02-25 Thread Douglas Bates
> "Hartmut" == Hartmut Koptein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So what do you say? I have also CC'd to the package >> maintainer. Is this a bug to fill a report, or is this specific >> to my specific setup (what is the status on other platforms reg >> this package?) Hartmut> Hmmm, do

Re: About r-base on the powerpc.

1999-02-25 Thread Hartmut Koptein
>I was about to fill a bug report on this, but I thought I asked first. > > In r-base 0.63.2/src/unix/system.c there are two references to the C function > setfpucw > > line 545: > > #ifdef linux > __setfpucw(_FPU_IEEE); > #endif > > line 626: > > #ifdef linux > __setfpucw(_FPU_DE

Re: About r-base on the powerpc.

1999-02-25 Thread Douglas Bates
> "KM" == Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KM>I was about to fill a bug report on this, but I thought I KM> asked first. KM> In r-base 0.63.2/src/unix/system.c there are two references to KM> the C function setfpucw KM> #ifdef linux KM> __setfpucw(_FPU_IEEE

About r-base on the powerpc.

1999-02-25 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I was about to fill a bug report on this, but I thought I asked first. In r-base 0.63.2/src/unix/system.c there are two references to the C function setfpucw line 545: #ifdef linux __setfpucw(_FPU_IEEE); #endif line 626: #ifdef linux __setfpucw(_