Re[4]: 2002 iBook / Xfree 4.2 artefacts

2003-11-18 Thread "Nathan"
> Yes, but you didn't tell us you are running 4.3, you only mentioned > unstable, so I assumed you were running 4.2. My bad, thought I mentioned that I was running 4.3 from experimental > Sounds like it could be related to heat? Shouldn't be; OS X runs just fine in a hot room, although I will loo

Re: Re[2]: 2002 iBook / Xfree 4.2 artefacts

2003-11-18 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 01:13, "?zthanТoi8-r?Q?" wrote: > > For one, radeon DRI didn't work on PPC yet in XFree86 4.2. > Several messages I've googled upon while trying to find a soultion > suggested that 4.3.0 corrected this. Yes, but you didn't tell us you are running 4.3, you only mentioned uns

Re[2]: 2002 iBook / Xfree 4.2 artefacts

2003-11-18 Thread "Nathan"
> For one, radeon DRI didn't work on PPC yet in XFree86 4.2. Several messages I've googled upon while trying to find a soultion suggested that 4.3.0 corrected this. > Weird, sounds like endianness breakage or the chip going nuts in > general. Does this persist over a reboot? The bevhavior is fa

Re: 2002 iBook / Xfree 4.2 artefacts

2003-11-18 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 22:29, "?zthanТoi8-r?Q?" wrote: > > X is behaving very oddly on my 2002 700Mhz iBook (radeon m6 LW) running > 2.6.0-test9/unstable. At first, it worked without any problems (aside > from DRI hard-locking the system, but that's probably a kernel issue). For one, radeon DRI

2002 iBook / Xfree 4.2 artefacts

2003-11-14 Thread "Nathan"
(sorry about the previous message, hit 'send' by mistake) X is behaving very oddly on my 2002 700Mhz iBook (radeon m6 LW) running 2.6.0-test9/unstable. At first, it worked without any problems (aside from DRI hard-locking the system, but that's probably a kernel issue). However, after several h

2002 iBook / Xfree

2003-11-14 Thread "Nathan"
"ВС:Бухгалтерия": ЛЕГКО! УДОБНО! ВЫГОДНО! http://r.mail.ru/cln2393/www.bc.e-style.ru/