Re: [linux-fbdev] Matrox and XFree86 4.0.2 update

2001-01-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 09:21:59AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > I just checked the Debian binary, and indeed it isn't. IIRC patches existed a > few years ago. They did/do exist, but were never completed. Same person who did the matrox accel for Xpmac (and who's name slips my mind right no

Re: [linux-fbdev] Matrox and XFree86 4.0.2 update

2001-01-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:38:25PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Kostas Gewrgiou wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > > > On 24 Jan 01 at 11:11, Ani Joshi wrote: > > > > > I recently ran into an issue with the

Re: [linux-fbdev] Matrox and XFree86 4.0.2 update

2001-01-25 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:38:25PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Kostas Gewrgiou wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > > On 24 Jan 01 at 11:11, Ani Joshi wrote: > > > > I recently ran into an issue with the matroxfb driver and XFree86 > > > > 4.0.2's >

Re: [linux-fbdev] Matrox and XFree86 4.0.2 update

2001-01-25 Thread Michel Dänzer
Kostas Gewrgiou wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Kostas Gewrgiou wrote: > > > > Changing the endian to little is the *right* thing, big-endian mode > > > doesn't offer us anything beyond problems in matroxfb 8/16 bit accesses > > > become a nig

Re: [linux-fbdev] Matrox and XFree86 4.0.2 update

2001-01-25 Thread Kostas Gewrgiou
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Kostas Gewrgiou wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > > > Nope it won't cause any problems, none of the XF[86][68]_FBDev servers where > > accelerated for matrox, other libs (SDL etc) that have accel for matr

Re: [linux-fbdev] Matrox and XFree86 4.0.2 update

2001-01-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Kostas Gewrgiou wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > On 24 Jan 01 at 11:11, Ani Joshi wrote: > > > I recently ran into an issue with the matroxfb driver and XFree86 4.0.2's > > > matrox driver. Sometime in the past someone decided to use BE > > > register ac

Re: [linux-fbdev] Matrox and XFree86 4.0.2 update

2001-01-25 Thread Kostas Gewrgiou
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > On 24 Jan 01 at 11:11, Ani Joshi wrote: > > > I recently ran into an issue with the matroxfb driver and XFree86 4.0.2's > > matrox driver. Sometime in the past someone decided to use BE > > register access in matroxfb for BE machines, while this is p

Re: [linux-fbdev] Matrox and XFree86 4.0.2 update

2001-01-24 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 24 Jan 01 at 11:11, Ani Joshi wrote: > I recently ran into an issue with the matroxfb driver and XFree86 4.0.2's > matrox driver. Sometime in the past someone decided to use BE > register access in matroxfb for BE machines, while this is probably The > Right Way, it produces problems in X. I