Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The question is : Did frans have a ethic reason to remove my commit
> access, or did he do it only out of spit to get ride of me ? I have
> seen many argue that since i resigned from being 'the d-i powerpc
> porter' it was ok for him to remove those commit
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But nobody cared to inform the powerpc users, who where trying to use the
> broken images on machines the april 1 build could not work.
I'm a powerpc user, and I wasn't trying to use the broken images.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have seen Frans claim various times about patches and changes i
> was proposing that it will never be applied anyway because i
> proposed it, and he didn't thrust me. Do you really thing that in
> the light of this me sending in patches just to have them
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am not willing to send in patches now. I was kicked out of d-i a month ago.
Gotcha. I don't understand why, however. I lack write access to all
kinds of things, but I still send in patches. It sounds like you care
about powerpc support, so I find it
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, i was kicked out of the d-i project. That is sad. Even so, i was
> willing to help, and discovered this not because they told it to me,
> but because i was blocked from helping. They had to do it meakly in
> my back.
What I heard you say was that you
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It should be removed from the actual etch release candidate until the
> situation improves. The etch release candidate guidelines include a working
> and well supported d-i port, and this criteria is not fullfilled, so powerpc
> should be dropped from pote
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, i am raising an alarm earlier, so people who care about powerpc will have
> time to act, and will not stay believing all is fine, and end with a mess 8
> month from now or such.
Hrm, perhaps I misunderstood your subject line. I understood it not
to b
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, who is working on the powerpc d-i port ? Only Colin Watson,
> but his duties in ubuntu don't leave him enough time to do the work
> properly, and it was always me in the past who ended up doing the
> work nobody else cared about.
I don't understand
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, i will not go this way. If the social problem doesn't solve itself in the
> near future, i am much more proposing to host a forked version of the d-i and
> some key packages, and fix stuff there.
So you are now declaring that you will not submit the p
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The debian installer netinst and businesscard images are now broken
> since almost a month, and since the d-i team kicked me out as
> powerpc maintainer, and removed my d-i commit rights, there is no
> way for me to help fix this, and this clearly demostra
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It was easily reproduced - there's no libmwdrivers.a for powerpc and the
> microwindows build tries to use that before it's built.
No, no, a thousand times no. microwindows does try to build
libmwdrivers.before it's used, and without someone giving m
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Worse - he wasn't using the UCI mail server as mailhub. And some bloke on
> the residential network caught my attention by means of spam. Next time
> I'll flame the hell out of the UCI network staff before blacklisting them
> again.
1) blacklist the
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Your mailer is rejecting valid email messages from me with no
> > explanation. FIX IT.
>
> 550 We don't accept mail from spammers isn't enough of an
> explanation?
Nope.
> Your ISP somehow landed itself on our blacklist.
My ISP is the University
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask
> every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their
> packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify
> (opt-in) maintainers about such problems).
R
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's why (only the last of four identical errors). According to the
> package listing page at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages there's no
> libmwdrivers.a in any of the PowerPC packages, any distribution. On ix86
> the file is in libmicrowindow
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's why (only the last of four identical errors). According to the
> package listing page at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages there's no
> libmwdrivers.a in any of the PowerPC packages, any distribution. On ix86
> the file is in libmicrowindow
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Please don't. I just tried to build it and got exactly the same error
> > > > as in the build report.
> >
> > > What version of apt do you have installed?
> >
> > 0.5.4. Why?
>
> Because I suspected a problem with apt at the bottom of thes
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 07:10:58PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> > I would like to close bug 121459, and rely on powerpc to attempt a
> > build by the normal process and report a new bug against the current
>
>
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've rescheduled the 0.88pre11-4 build hoping the build dependencies
> install now. But that doesn't relate to #121459 at all.
Oh yes, and Michael: direct mail to you still bounces with your mail
server saying "We don't accept mail from spammers".
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've rescheduled the 0.88pre11-4 build hoping the build dependencies
> install now. But that doesn't relate to #121459 at all.
As far as I can tell, it doesn't work:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=microwindows&ver=0.88pre11-4&arch=powerpc&st
chicken wire," Tom said defensively
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 04 Jan 2002 15:47:30 -0800
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 18
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; cha
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (I rarely do these
> days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and
> logs).
This is not such a good idea. Maintainers are generally not
responsible for checking build status and logs; the port maintainer
(whoever is responsible for m
microwindows is not building on powerpc, but I don't know why. The
bug report filed seems wrong to me, and the buildd report at
http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=powerpc&state=Dep-Wait
reports:
libs/microwindows_0.88pre11-4: Dep-Wait by schmitz-pb [optional:uncompiled]
Dependencies: freet
See the referenced bug.
I would be happy to try and fix this myself, but I don't have access
to a powerpc running sid.
If someone could either work on fixing this and submit a patch, or
alternatively, point me at a powerpc sid box, then I'd work on it
myself.
Please CC me and debian-qa directly
24 matches
Mail list logo
