Re: Bug#58358: aspell on PowerPC (Was: Release-critical Bugreport for February 18, 2000

2000-02-24 Thread Sudhakar Chandrasekharan
"C.M. Connelly" proclaimed: > Nope, aspell 0.29.1 shows the same behavior. If, however, you > apply this patch: > > --- aspell-.29.1/src/aspell.cc-original Wed Feb 23 18:38:47 2000 > +++ aspell-.29.1/src/aspell.cc Wed Feb 23 18:28:28 2000 > @@ -665,9 +665,9 @@ > << "\" for reading.\n

Re: aspell on PowerPC (Was: Release-critical Bugreport for February18, 2000

2000-02-24 Thread Sudhakar Chandrasekharan
Kevin Atkinson proclaimed: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, C.M. Connelly wrote: > > Nope, aspell 0.29.1 shows the same behavior. If, however, you > > apply this patch: > > > > --- aspell-.29.1/src/aspell.cc-original Wed Feb 23 18:38:47 2000 > > +++ aspell-.29.1/src/aspell.ccWed Feb 23 18:28:2

Re: aspell on PowerPC (Was: Release-critical Bugreport for February 18, 2000

2000-02-23 Thread Sudhakar Chandrasekharan
kar C13n http://people.netscape.com/thaths/ Lead Indentured Slave--- Begin Message --- On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote: > Kevin, > > There seems to be a bug in aspell that causes it to crash when compiled on > a powerpc. The details about the bug are at > http://