the client or on the web. Complain about _Microsoft_
on the client and on the web. Therein lies the problem.
BTW, it's really great to hear there is now a recent version of
Java for PPC, even if it's only server-side capable. Every
additional bit of Java support helps in th
esult is a bloated web with a high
fluff to content ratio. Does this mean we should get rid
of images? No. Just try to avoid the sites that misuse
them, and be aware of the issue so we don't misuse them
ourselves! Same with Java, Flash, etc.
Rick
--
R
y stuck at 1.1 forever or we all suffer
(i.e, new browser technology will be MS-driven by default)
Rick
--
Rick
Lutowski
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ oo
Josh Huber wrote:
>
> Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized.
> > 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers
> > 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no Java 3D for browsers
> > 3. No Java
lawsuit against MS is almost totally
for the purpose of ensuring Java Plug-in continues to
work with IE (which due to the MS desktop monopoly
currently has 80% of the browser marketshare).
Rick
--
Rick
Lutowski
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ oo
5 matches
Mail list logo