Re: Success with IBM JDK 1.3.0 for PPC _WITH_ JIT

2002-05-25 Thread Rick Lutowski
the client or on the web. Complain about _Microsoft_ on the client and on the web. Therein lies the problem. BTW, it's really great to hear there is now a recent version of Java for PPC, even if it's only server-side capable. Every additional bit of Java support helps in th

Re: Success with IBM JDK 1.3.0 for PPC _WITH_ JIT

2002-05-25 Thread Rick Lutowski
esult is a bloated web with a high fluff to content ratio. Does this mean we should get rid of images? No. Just try to avoid the sites that misuse them, and be aware of the issue so we don't misuse them ourselves! Same with Java, Flash, etc. Rick -- R

Re: Success with IBM JDK 1.3.0 for PPC _WITH_ JIT

2002-05-24 Thread Rick Lutowski
y stuck at 1.1 forever or we all suffer (i.e, new browser technology will be MS-driven by default) Rick -- Rick Lutowski |[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ oo

Re: Success with IBM JDK 1.3.0 for PPC _WITH_ JIT

2002-05-24 Thread Rick Lutowski
Josh Huber wrote: > > Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized. > > 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers > > 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no Java 3D for browsers > > 3. No Java

Re: Success with IBM JDK 1.3.0 for PPC _WITH_ JIT

2002-05-24 Thread Rick Lutowski
lawsuit against MS is almost totally for the purpose of ensuring Java Plug-in continues to work with IE (which due to the MS desktop monopoly currently has 80% of the browser marketshare). Rick -- Rick Lutowski |[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ oo