Am 19.01.2005 um 17:05 schrieb grave:
Hi !
We successfully installed a debian system on a js20 blade (2.2 powerpc
970FX). We first tryed the d-i pseries.img from cajus without success,
we thought this was due to a conflic between the SOL configuration and
the eth0 interface (we have only on
Am 19.01.2005 um 17:05 schrieb grave:
Hi !
We successfully installed a debian system on a js20 blade (2.2 powerpc
970FX). We first tryed the d-i pseries.img from cajus without success,
we thought this was due to a conflic between the SOL configuration and
the eth0 interface (we have only one swi
Am 15.01.2005 um 00:42 schrieb Anton Blanchard:
Hi,
I've just updated the installer image to have no POWER4+ optimization,
but the language chooser seems to be broken. I've no idea why.
Nice, it gets a lot further on POWER3 now :) It stops right here:
time_init: decrementer frequency = 93
Am 15.01.2005 um 00:42 schrieb Anton Blanchard:
Hi,
I've just updated the installer image to have no POWER4+ optimization,
but the language chooser seems to be broken. I've no idea why.
Nice, it gets a lot further on POWER3 now :) It stops right here:
time_init: decrementer frequency = 93.748235 MH
Hiho,
I've just updated the installer image to have no POWER4+ optimization, but the
language chooser seems to be broken. I've no idea why.
The tg3 drivers have been added, too.
You may try anyway ;-)
Cheers,
Cajus
Hiho,
I've just updated the installer image to have no POWER4+ optimization, but the
language chooser seems to be broken. I've no idea why.
The tg3 drivers have been added, too.
You may try anyway ;-)
Cheers,
Cajus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Freitag 07 Januar 2005 15:11, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> > I just tried it on my POWER3 box. You dont happen to have
> > CONFIG_POWER4_ONLY enabled do you? That option enables some minor
> > optimisations that actually prevent booting on older boxes.
>
> It boots on a 1.6GHz JS20 blade. Unfort
Am Freitag, 7. Januar 2005 14:47 schrieb Anton Blanchard:
> Hi,
>
> > There's a 64-bit tftp installer image based on kernel 2.6.10 here:
> >
> > http://debian.gonicus.de/debian/dists/sarge/main/binary-powerpc/pseries.i
> >mg
> >
> > Since most installer packages are not "official" yet, you've to co
Am Freitag, 7. Januar 2005 08:34 schrieb Sven Luther:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:33:00AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > > Oh, if it is the js20, i think we had had some report of people trying
> > > to make it work some time back. I don't think d-i is already upto it,
> > > but the work Cajus
Am Freitag, 24. Dezember 2004 01:52 schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:04:27AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2004 07:23 schrieb Sven Luther:
> > > Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> > > > While looking for the way to set the co
Am Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2004 07:23 schrieb Sven Luther:
[...]
> > While looking for the way to set the correct subarch, I found that in
> > base-installer's postinst, line 438 the CPU variable is filled by:
> >
> > CPU=`grep '^cpu[[:space:]]*:' /proc/cpuinfo | cut -d: -f2 | sed 's/^ *//;
> >
Am 23.12.2004 um 07:23 schrieb Sven Luther:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 06:27:11PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2004 14:24 schrieb Colin Watson:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
I've prepared a partman-prep package which shoul
Am Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2004 14:24 schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> > I've prepared a partman-prep package which should add support for PPC
> > PReP boot partitions to the installer. The package has been forked from
&
Hi
I've prepared a partman-prep package which should add support for PPC
PReP
boot partitions to the installer. The package has been forked from
partman-palo.
Now, short before testing, I'm wondering about the mechanism which
takes care
about loading this module.
I've grep'ed through the com
Am 20.12.2004 um 15:59 schrieb Sven Luther:
[...]
Mmm, not sure about this, debian-boot@lists.debian.org would be the
best place
to ask about this. Did you try the network-console installation ?
It's a bit high traffic there. I've asked some questions there, but
never got answers,
maybe th
Am 20.12.2004 um 15:37 schrieb Sven Luther:
[...]
works fine.
Besides this, only a 2.6.9+ makes sense because of the included
virtualization
features. The 2.6.8(.1) did not boot a p670 at all, while the p615
and
new power5
machines did.o
Yep, i am working on real 64bit kernels, but saddly la
Am 20.12.2004 um 14:37 schrieb Sven Luther:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 02:19:06PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Am 20.12.2004 um 13:59 schrieb Sven Luther:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 10:49:32AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Hi!
Since I had access for some power4 and power5 System the last time
Am 20.12.2004 um 13:59 schrieb Sven Luther:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 10:49:32AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Hi!
Since I had access for some power4 and power5 System the last time and
noticed that
the debian installer didn't work on this hardware (a 64bit kernel
seems
to be needed),
Hi!
Since I had access for some power4 and power5 System the last time and
noticed that
the debian installer didn't work on this hardware (a 64bit kernel seems
to be needed),
I did some integration on this and added a "pseries" target to the
debian installer including
the 64 bit kernel and a
> Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2004 01:09 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
>
> [...]
>
> > Overall, we can go the gentoo way, and do a full 64 bits debian
> > distribution independant from the 32 bits one, or we can simply do like
> > other distributions do, and I think it makes some sense, is to have a
>
Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2004 17:44 schrieb Guido Guenther:
> Dear maintainers of a piece of power management infrastructure,
> recently a discussion started on debian-ppc on how to better integrate
> the different power management solutions within Debian. Please have a
> look at the thread starting
Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2004 01:09 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
[...]
> Overall, we can go the gentoo way, and do a full 64 bits debian
> distribution independant from the 32 bits one, or we can simply do like
> other distributions do, and I think it makes some sense, is to have a
> biarch dist
Hi!
Just a simple query... I _may_ have a chance to get a ppc64
machine. Is anyone interested in such a port?
I know that it basically works with the 32 bit binaries, but the
installation is non trivial right now and having no 64 bit code
isn't optimal, too.
Thanks,
Cajus
23 matches
Mail list logo
