On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:29:19PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm not sure what your point is.
>
> Maybe “crazy how ppc64 people got interested in getting their packages
> built as opposed to getting debian.org ports page updated”? Anyway, if
> you want to know about the port, see the wiki[1]
Lennart Sorensen (2014-07-25):
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:48:13PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> > Not in debian proper but it is on debian-ports.org and it appears to
> > be pretty healthy.
>
> Hmm, not listed under the official nor unofficial debian ports, while
> ppc64el is.
>
> https://www.de
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:48:13PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> Not in debian proper but it is on debian-ports.org and it appears to
> be pretty healthy.
Hmm, not listed under the official nor unofficial debian ports, while
ppc64el is.
https://www.debian.org/ports/
ppc64el listed, ppc64 is not.
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:14:08AM +0100, peter green wrote:
Another question the ftpmasters will likely have is what is the
relationship between ppc64 and ppc64el. Is there hardware that will
run ppc64 but not ppc64el? is there hardware that will run ppc64el
but not p
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:14:08AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> Another question the ftpmasters will likely have is what is the
> relationship between ppc64 and ppc64el. Is there hardware that will
> run ppc64 but not ppc64el? is there hardware that will run ppc64el
> but not ppc64? is there hardwar
5 matches
Mail list logo
