Hi,
I'm not anywhere near an expert on this, so take what I say with a pound
of salt or so ... :) I was reading up on the PCI specifications to try
to understand a little bit about drivers, and it was mentioned that the
x86 architecture use I/O space to access devices, whereas with PowerPC
system
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:16:53PM -0500, Kevin B. Hendricks scrawled:
> Sorry I misunderstood the issue. I thought it could be reproduced under
> ppc Linux. I did not understand it was a fluke event.
>
> Why would this "fluke" be holding up X11R6 development at all if it could
> not be "repro
Hi,
I'm was trying to "debug" a problem with a driver and my PowerPC board,
and I wrote this simple program which works fine on an x86 Debian Woody
box (and does not use x86 dependent functions as far as I can tell):
#include
#include
int main() {
ioperm(0x00, 0xff, 1);
pri
On Die, 2003-02-04 at 01:00, John P. Fisher wrote:
> Ryan: I *think* you may need a Radeon card. I defer to others with more
> experience, but I think I remember our guru ordering Radeon cards for our
> G4s so we could run xwindows
A Radeon card might be better supported, but X (or the X Win
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:06:26AM +0100, florian wrote:
> hi!
>
> im running debian sid with the latest gnome 2 packages. for
> some reason every python app which uses gnome components of
> glade segfauts..
>
> example:
>
> [~] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [23:49:37]> straw
>
> (straw:5054): GLib-GOb
Ryan: I *think* you may need a Radeon card. I defer to others with more
experience, but I think I remember our guru ordering Radeon cards for our
G4s so we could run xwindows
He's sick, so I can't ask today.
Anyway there should be some info on it if I am correct.
John
At 05:43 PM 2/2/200
hi!
im running debian sid with the latest gnome 2 packages. for
some reason every python app which uses gnome components of
glade segfauts..
example:
[~] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[23:49:37]> straw
(straw:5054): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gobject.c:946: object class
`GnomeProgram' has no property named
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 22:02, Derrik Pates wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 08:41:49PM +0100, florian wrote:
> > but why does it not throw this error when i run the app as root?
>
> Because root has access to everything, I suppose, just like on every
> other traditional Unix-ish system. Look at the
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 08:41:49PM +0100, florian wrote:
> but why does it not throw this error when i run the app as root?
Because root has access to everything, I suppose, just like on every
other traditional Unix-ish system. Look at the permissions on /dev/sg*
(or /dev/scsi/hostX/busY/targetZ/l
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:49:17PM +, matthew yee-king wrote:
> So does this mean you have smooth dvd playback on a tibook 400 ? what
> software you using?
mplayer and recent versions of xine all work fine for my g4 400.
==rob
--
Rob LathamWoodrid
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 20:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You're error message says it all:
>
> Testing /dev/cdrom for SCSI interface
> No generic SCSI device found to match CDROM device
>
> Search the list archives for how to setup your scsi-generic and ide-scsi
> devices properly.
florian wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 20:04, Nicolai Langfeldt wrote:
florian wrote:
sorry to bug you guys again with this. i was just wondering, if
really nobody has a idea about the problem, since i didnt get
any response.. like i said its definally not a copy protected
cd and it wor
You're error message says it all:
Testing /dev/cdrom for SCSI interface
No generic SCSI device found to match CDROM device
Search the list archives for how to setup your scsi-generic and ide-scsi
devices properly.
-Brett
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 07:36:14PM +0100, florian wrote:
>
Warning - alsa's default config will install alsa into
/usr/lib, /usr/bin, and /share/includes by default, totally violating
debian's filesystem policy and making it a pain to migrate to a packaged
version, should it become available. I re-ran the ./config scripts to
combat this so it'd install in
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 20:04, Nicolai Langfeldt wrote:
> florian wrote:
>
> >sorry to bug you guys again with this. i was just wondering, if
> >really nobody has a idea about the problem, since i didnt get
> >any response.. like i said its definally not a copy protected
> >cd and it works perfectly
Hi,
Sorry I misunderstood the issue. I thought it could be reproduced under
ppc Linux. I did not understand it was a fluke event.
Why would this "fluke" be holding up X11R6 development at all if it could
not be "reproduced" even by the original submitter?
Sorry, just trying to help.
Kevin
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:55:34PM -0500, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
Hi,
> Perhaps the code has someplaces where char is explictly assumed to be
> signed.
Very unlikely, patch is highly portable and I've never heard of any such
problems with it.
> And then re-run thetest case and see if now pa
florian wrote:
sorry to bug you guys again with this. i was just wondering, if
really nobody has a idea about the problem, since i didnt get
any response.. like i said its definally not a copy protected
cd and it works perfectly on another machine..
Probably a permission problem with the corres
Hi,
Not sure if this is relevant or not. The default under PPC Linux gcc is to
have all char types be unsigned by default whereas on x86 Linux char types
default to be signed (I believe). (I belive PPC Linux is unique iin this
default among Linux platforms)
Perhaps the code has someplaces wh
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 19:29, Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:35:56PM +0100, Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
>
> [CCing debian-powerpc, see http://bugs.debian.org/175921 for context.
> Anyone here ever seen any ppc specific breakage in GNU patch?]
>
> Hi,
>
> > Unless this can be
sorry to bug you guys again with this. i was just wondering, if
really nobody has a idea about the problem, since i didnt get
any response.. like i said its definally not a copy protected
cd and it works perfectly on another machine..
thanks again!
ciao!
florian
> > On 28 Jan, this message
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:35:56PM +0100, Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
[CCing debian-powerpc, see http://bugs.debian.org/175921 for context.
Anyone here ever seen any ppc specific breakage in GNU patch?]
Hi,
> Unless this can be reproduced somehow there's probably not a lot anyone
> can do about it
its working =)
thx
El Lunes 03 Febrero 2003 16:39, gimli escribió:
> I have a ibook2.2 runnin X with DRI
> I 've instaled kde3.1 and it runs great!
> But kdm crashes..
> Any ideas?
Look at the README in /usr/share/doc/drm-trunk (or similar). You must edit the
file that configures kdm (I don't remember the path, sor
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 16:39, gimli wrote:
> I have a ibook2.2 runnin X with DRI.
> I 've instaled kde3.1 and it runs great!
> But kdm crashes...
> Any ideas?
> Thx
>
> Miguel
>
> kdm.log show this message:
> AUDIT: Mon Feb 3 15:14:08 2003: 1004 X: client 2 rejected from local host
> Auth name:
I have a ibook2.2 runnin X with DRI.
I 've instaled kde3.1 and it runs great!
But kdm crashes...
Any ideas?
Thx
Miguel
kdm.log show this message:
AUDIT: Mon Feb 3 15:14:08 2003: 1004 X: client 2 rejected from local host
Auth name: XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 ID: -1
Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused b
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 14:26, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> deb http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk/sid/./
> deb-src http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk/sid/./
Actually, I just changed that to
deb http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/./
deb-src h
deb http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk/sid/./
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk/sid/./
The libGL package is now called xlibmesa-gl1-dri-trunk and is a full
fledged libgl1 provider again.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (pow
28 matches
Mail list logo
