On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:55:34PM -0500, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote: Hi,
> Perhaps the code has someplaces where char is explictly assumed to be > signed. Very unlikely, patch is highly portable and I've never heard of any such problems with it. > And then re-run thetest case and see if now passes. That's just the point: there is no (reproducible) test case. It apparently just happened once and silently went away afterwards, which is why I don't really believe that it's a bug in patch, but some weird intermittent failure of whatever... -Michael
