On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 09:15:36PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > does yaboot need to be fixed or the kernel? a single patch to just
> > fix this one flaw would be useful, so that people can use
> > ftp.kernel.org again plus a single stable patch. as opposed to the
> > random broken devel trees.
>
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 08:12:05PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 04:24:38PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 03:01:16PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:42:08PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > >
> > > > Do you have kernel-patch-2.
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 04:24:38PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 03:01:16PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:42:08PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > > Do you have kernel-patch-2.4.4-powerpc installed as well? The pristine 2.4
> > > kernel source does
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 04:24:38PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 03:01:16PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:42:08PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > > Do you have kernel-patch-2.4.4-powerpc installed as well? The pristine 2.4
> > > kernel source does
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 06:44:25PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 04:44:35PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 05:10:52PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > I would too. I just couldn't think of any way to do that.
> >
> > what about grabbing the ids and host numb
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 03:01:16PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:42:08PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>
> > Do you have kernel-patch-2.4.4-powerpc installed as well? The pristine 2.4
> > kernel source doesn't work on PPC yet.
>
> how is 2.4.5 looking? it was released las
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:42:08PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Do you have kernel-patch-2.4.4-powerpc installed as well? The pristine 2.4
> kernel source doesn't work on PPC yet.
how is 2.4.5 looking? it was released last night.
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
pgpSSqwrZi
Craige McWhirter wrote:
>
> Afternoon one and all. I sucked down the source for kernel 2.4.4 from
> Sid last night, played with the settings via "make xconfig" then happily
> ran make-kpkg until it hit this:
>
> ppc_ksyms.c:335: `down_read_failed' undeclared here (not in
> a function)
> ppc_ksyms
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 08:02:16AM +, Lorenzo De Vito wrote:
> How can I get a copy of GNUpg for debianppc or others pgp softwares
> compatible with powerpc ?
With the same problem I found mine on potato a fortnight ago.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subje
Lorenzo De Vito wrote:
>
> Once I've a public crypted key, how can I certificate it for use as
> Debian developer ?
Have you looked thoroughly at http://nm.debian.org?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)\ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
CS student, Free Software enthusiast \
Once I've a public crypted key, how can I certificate it for use as
Debian developer ?
> you don't need devfs to get static naming. see OpenBSD.=20
I never saw static bus/ID based naming in OpenBSD, but I'll take your
word for it. However, devfs is still the only way to get such naming
under Linux.
--
Mike Shuey
> Er, how does devfs do anything different with "swappable" CDs? The
> CD player's device does not change with the insertion or removal of
> CDs.
I'm not talking about changing disks, I'm talking about swapping out
CD drives. I find it extremely useful to be able to add a CD or tape
drive at run
Andrew Sharp wrote:
> > > I didn't think it was possible to change the resolution when you're in
> > > an X environment. I don't exactly know what the resolution is that I'm
> > > in to begin with, unfortunately, though I believe it's 1024x768. Is
> > > there a way to tell what the current resolut
devfs isn't a mindless new feature. It's preparation for the big changes
planned for kernel 3.0, iirc. (I havent payed attention to kernel dev
for a while, so I can't elaborate.)
Aside from that, an immutable naming scheme for discs is quite attrac-
tive, if you ever add hardware. It's _useful_
Michael Shuey wrote:
>
> > > > But how long will that last. What I want to know is, what question
> > > > was devfs an answer to? There must have been one, right? Is it a
> >
> > > devfs is a solution in search of a problem.
> >
> > that's what I thought.
>
> devfs is _great_. Solaris has had
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 08:02:16AM +, Lorenzo De Vito wrote:
> How can I get a copy of GNUpg for debianppc or others pgp softwares
> compatible with powerpc ?
> I try to download it from debian ftp site but there was only one for
> i386 architecture.
echo 'deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian
How can I get a copy of GNUpg for debianppc or others pgp softwares
compatible with powerpc ?
I try to download it from debian ftp site but there was only one for
i386 architecture.
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 01:59:33AM -0500, Michael Shuey wrote:
> > > > But how long will that last. What I want to know is, what question
> > > > was devfs an answer to? There must have been one, right? Is it a
> >
> > > devfs is a solution in search of a problem.
> >
> > that's what I thought
> > > But how long will that last. What I want to know is, what question
> > > was devfs an answer to? There must have been one, right? Is it a
>
> > devfs is a solution in search of a problem.
>
> that's what I thought.
devfs is _great_. Solaris has had this sort of thing (albeit with short
20 matches
Mail list logo
