oops (was Re: ITP: Double Choco Latte (dcl).)

2001-02-16 Thread Sam Powers
oops, sorry, i sent that to the wrong place.. i need more caffeine ;)

Re: moving from linuxppc - newbie needs help please

2001-02-16 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 06:52:04PM -0800, Matt Brubeck wrote: > > the option key trick is ibook and agp g4 only. it won't work on an > > imac. > > This actually works on my slot-loading iMac. It will definitely not work > on older iMacs, though. I don't know which slot-loading models support it.

Re: moving from linuxppc - newbie needs help please

2001-02-16 Thread Matt Brubeck
> the option key trick is ibook and agp g4 only. it won't work on an > imac. This actually works on my slot-loading iMac. It will definitely not work on older iMacs, though. I don't know which slot-loading models support it.

Re: "CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=y" in default debian ppc kernel

2001-02-16 Thread Takehiko Abe
Mike Fedyk wrote: > > This seems to be exactly what happened to my system (kernel 2.2.18/ > > oldworld)--it didn't boot without the monitor attached. Upon reading > > What model? > PowerMac 9600/200 regards, abe -- We need to do what we need to do. -- George W. Bush

Re: "CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=y" in default debian ppc kernel

2001-02-16 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 04:55:40PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > BOOTX_TEXT is a misnomor though, it really doesn't have much to do > > with BootX at all. its also not required for either BootX or > > non-BootX booting. > > > Why do we need BOOTX_TEXT in the debian kernel? Is the installer using

"PCI quirks" in kernel for ppc

2001-02-16 Thread Mike Fedyk
Does this help for ppc? The help talks about BIOS which I know is only on x86. Does this code include anything that helps a non x86 comp? Mike

Re: "CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=y" in default debian ppc kernel

2001-02-16 Thread Mike Fedyk
Ethan Benson wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:21:48PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:15:31PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > Look in /boot/vmlinux-2.2.17, you'll see. > > > > > > Ethan, what kind of machines need CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n with quik? > > > > At least t

Re: OF setting for Quik booting in a 7200

2001-02-16 Thread Andrew Sharp
Mike Fedyk wrote: > > Andrew Sharp wrote: > > > > Gee, quik works just fine on my 7200. But the OF is so lame that it > > doesn't really matter whether quik works or not. The two reliable methods > > I use for the 7200 are a boot floppy (the one from the CD with the editing > > changes sugges

Re: "CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=y" in default debian ppc kernel

2001-02-16 Thread Mike Fedyk
Takehiko Abe wrote: > > Ethan Benson wrote: > > > > > Ethan, what kind of machines need CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n with quik? > > > > > > At least the 7200, I believe. > > > > correct, i talked to ben about this recently the problem is the way > > this particular feature trys to access the OF framebuffe

Re: OF setting for Quik booting in a 7200

2001-02-16 Thread Mike Fedyk
Ethan Benson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 02:10:03PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > ... Hmm, on one of my 7200s /dev/sda is on mesh id 0 > > the standard apple setup is the hard disk is id 0 cdrom id 3. > > > Oh, well. I'll compile a 2.2.18 or 19pre2 and test it with quik. > > if you u

Re: ITP: Double Choco Latte (dcl).

2001-02-16 Thread Sam Powers
On Thursday 15 February 2001 11:33, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 05:36:30PM -0800, Sam Powers wrote: > > On Thursday 15 February 2001 02:08, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I intend to package (tomorrow :) this package found at > > > dcl.sourceforge.org > > > > > > It is

Re: OF setting for Quik booting in a 7200

2001-02-16 Thread Mike Fedyk
Andrew Sharp wrote: > > Gee, quik works just fine on my 7200. But the OF is so lame that it doesn't > really matter whether quik works or not. The two reliable methods I use for > the 7200 are a boot floppy (the one from the CD with the editing changes > suggested by another lister to boot us

Re: OF setting for Quik booting in a 7200

2001-02-16 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 01:51:35PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > Ethan Benson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 02:10:03PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > > > > I've spent the last month trying to get QUIK to work on a 7200, if you > > > want to > > > get it working in a reasonable time, make a

Re: OF setting for Quik booting in a 7200

2001-02-16 Thread Andrew Sharp
DOH! Unmangled URL here: http://www.aladdinsys.com/expander/ Andrew Sharp wrote: > > Gee, quik works just fine on my 7200. But the OF is so lame that it doesn't > really matter whether quik works or not. The two reliable methods I use for > the 7200 are a boot floppy (the one from the CD wi

Re: OF setting for Quik booting in a 7200

2001-02-16 Thread Andrew Sharp
Gee, quik works just fine on my 7200. But the OF is so lame that it doesn't really matter whether quik works or not. The two reliable methods I use for the 7200 are a boot floppy (the one from the CD with the editing changes suggested by another lister to boot using my hard drive's root partit

Re: OF setting for Quik booting in a 7200

2001-02-16 Thread Mike Fedyk
Ethan Benson wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 02:10:03PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > > I've spent the last month trying to get QUIK to work on a 7200, if you want > > to > > get it working in a reasonable time, make a 50MB hfs partition install > > MacOS 8.5 > > and bootX. It'll make the e

Re: oldworld benchmarks & X funny business

2001-02-16 Thread jeramy b smith
Andrew Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [If you don't care about OldWorld Macs, you can safely hit DELETE now.] > > make vmlinux w/o cache: 60 minutes > make vmlinux w/256KB cache: 45 minutes. > > Hmm, looks like a clear winner of about 25%. > Yeah, I got a hold of a 7200/75 once. I looked

Re: PMUD

2001-02-16 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> >That wasn't directed at you, as I hope you knew well enough. But we could >need a few more eyes looking at this problem. Even though it seems to fall >into the 'hopeless' class :-) Well, we are close to it. Darwin source has sleep support for the machine, so except for some binary only drivers,

oldworld benchmarks & X funny business

2001-02-16 Thread Andrew Sharp
[If you don't care about OldWorld Macs, you can safely hit DELETE now.] All the software and packages mentioned in this post are from the stable release. So I got this 256KB cache module for the Ol' 7200/75, which has a hard time keeping up with the last 486 I used, and it seemed to run faster.

X keyboard settings on Mac...

2001-02-16 Thread wcrowshaw
I'm using X 3.3.36 on potato. Comparing XF86Config files between my debian install and my linuxppc install, I found the following difference: On debian ppc XF86Config, there is the line: XkbKeymap "macintosh" On linuxppc, there is no such line, instead: XkbKeycodes "macintosh" XbkTypes "default

Re: PMUD

2001-02-16 Thread Michael Schmitz
> >Nope, just missing sleep support in the kernel. Will be fixed as soon as > >someone with a Pismo does some serious kernel hacking to properly > >implement sleep, and posts the patch to linuxppc-dev. > > Well, I'm doing regular serious kernel hacking with a Pismo and still > couldn't get sleep to

Re: Cube installation boot problems

2001-02-16 Thread Ian Neath
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, I noted a boot problem with the G4 Cube: >With either of the yaboot commands, Debian tries to boot but I get the >message "wrong partition 1 signature" and then the screen flashes a couple >of times, there is another message I can't quite read, then the system >hangs (monitor

Re: nautilus

2001-02-16 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Phil Fraering wrote: > I sort of had as a back burner project getting everything together > I'd need to compile nautilus. Nautilus actually has a real Build-Depends, but some of its dependencies don't (e.g. medusa), and libglade doesn't build out-of-box right now. I built libglade using the patc

Re: "CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=y" in default debian ppc kernel

2001-02-16 Thread Takehiko Abe
Ethan Benson wrote: > > > Ethan, what kind of machines need CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n with quik? > > > > At least the 7200, I believe. > > correct, i talked to ben about this recently the problem is the way > this particular feature trys to access the OF framebuffer, on > oldworlds with non-existant o

Re: nautilus

2001-02-16 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 09:06:33AM -0600, Phil Fraering wrote: > > PS: How do you determine which packages are necessary to compile > a debian source package against? Is there a command for apt-cache > or something like that? if its done right it should include build-depends which you can see in

nautilus

2001-02-16 Thread Phil Fraering
I sort of had as a back burner project getting everything together I'd need to compile nautilus. However, yesterday I checked to see if nautilus was available precompiled and it was. I'm downloading it now to see if it works. If nautilus works, does this mean evolution will compile? ISTR that one

Re: Pushing up daisies...

2001-02-16 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 10:58:44AM +, Rob Andrews wrote: > In newsgate.debian.powerpc, Ethan Benson wrote: > > i hope your warrentee has not yet expired, because your bootrom has > > probably been destroyed. see the netbsd FAQ: > > http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/macppc/faq.html#ofw-bugs > > A

Re: help on yaboot, please

2001-02-16 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 04:33:04AM -0800, ÀÌÁØ°É wrote: > How do I override the yaboot.conf manually? you can type an full path to a image in the boot: prompt, though unfortunatly this is broken on yaboot 0.9, you can also boot a image on the yaboot command line which might work on 0.9 at the boo

Re: help on yaboot, please

2001-02-16 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, > [...] boot from /dev/hda17/vmlinux with /dev/hda17 as the root > partition WITHOUT the help of yaboot.conf. My pismo [...] Type `hd:17,/vmlinux root=/dev/hda17 video=aty128fb:vmode:17' at the boot: prompt. Regards, Jens. -- J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe! Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz

help on yaboot, please

2001-02-16 Thread ÀÌÁØ°É
How do I override the yaboot.conf manually? I was playing with the partition table in order to use the HD more efficiently. I even editted /etc/yaboot.conf but was stupid enough not to remember to run ybin before rebooting. So, my "rescue" partition is /dev/hda17 but yaboot currently thinks it is

Re: Pushing up daisies...

2001-02-16 Thread Rob Andrews
In newsgate.debian.powerpc, Ethan Benson wrote: > i hope your warrentee has not yet expired, because your bootrom has > probably been destroyed. see the netbsd FAQ: > http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/macppc/faq.html#ofw-bugs Aye, that's what I'd read. Thus bringing the sudden, painful realisation t

Re: "CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=y" in default debian ppc kernel

2001-02-16 Thread Claus
>: > >: > Ethan, what kind of machines need CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n with quik? >: >: At least the 7200, I believe. >: and PB3400c 0.02 euro Claus

Re: "CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=y" in default debian ppc kernel

2001-02-16 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:21:48PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:15:31PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > Look in /boot/vmlinux-2.2.17, you'll see. > > > > Ethan, what kind of machines need CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n with quik? > > At least the 7200, I believe. correct, i tal

Re: NEWBIE: bootdisk for powermac (SOLVED+TRICK)

2001-02-16 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 07:08:32PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > I guess. I've been trying for ages to figure out what's wrong with it. excuse stating the obvious, but this problem appeared at the same time as enabling the new input layer in the kernel, could it not be that the input layer

Re: moving from linuxppc - newbie needs help please

2001-02-16 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 08:57:05AM +0900, pantaloon wrote: > "MacLife"'s feb. issue is giving a special article + a cd > to make people install "HolonLinux" > and it tells us that > people with iMacs made before Oct,1999 should use bootX misinformation is never in short supply. > oh > about 2 qu

Re: Pushing up daisies...

2001-02-16 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 07:58:22PM +, Rob Andrews wrote: > Seems that there's a certain amount of reading in advance that should be > done when playing with open firmware settings. Be warned: Don't type > the following commands into your OF, unless you know your machine will > survive. correct