On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:26:23PM -0700, Taro Fukunaga wrote:
> Well I gave up on this one and set up anon ftp. But for some reason I
> cannot go beyond my ethernet. pon dials and ifconfig reports that I am
> connected. But all attempts to ping outside go towards my ethernet. So
> apt-config can't
Well I gave up on this one and set up anon ftp. But for some reason I
(Bcannot go beyond my ethernet. pon dials and ifconfig reports that I am
(Bconnected. But all attempts to ping outside go towards my ethernet. So
(Bapt-config can't use an outside ftp server. The other computer I am
(Bconnect
Justin McKillican wrote:
> I have it running on debian potato/ppc as well as woody/x86 (can't remember
> if i tried it for woody, might of been netatalk).
>
> got any logs or errors messages you could look at?
I've got it working now. I needed to run smbpasswd.
Brendan Simon.
I've succeeded in installing the base system. Why doesn't the installer
(Blet me specify a non-anonymous ftp server for install? Is there a way to
(Bset this up?
(B
(BThanks,
(B
(BTaro
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 08:33:51PM +0200, Michael Lyngbøl wrote:
>
> 2.2.15 is fine with me.
so long as you have no untrusted local users... (huge security hole)
> I'm still to figure out why 2.2.16+ won't boot?! I suppose it's just
> broken.
if you have a kernel hacker hat put it on and look
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> BTW, I assume you'll want HAM8 in that mode as well soon? :-)
Oh, Geert, you volunteer for writing the necessary shadowfb code? :)
BTW someone (Kars de Jong) mentioned working on a dedicated Amiga driver (with
Blitter acceleration? :) some months ago, any idea what ca
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Michel [iso-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> Björn Johansson wrote:
> > Is the screenmode PAL:lowres(320x256) supported by the X-server(Xfree86)?
>
> In 3.3.x: yes. In 4.x: not yet probably. I'm currently working on it.
>
> > If it is, how do I change it in my XF86Config file? By the w
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 08:33:51PM +0200, Michael Lyngbøl wrote:
[cut]
> Thank you everybody who has helped me getting this box up and running!
>
> I'll summ up my experiences on a web page. More to come.
I've put up: http://lyngbol.dk/linux/debian/powerpc-install.html
Comments, questions, etc
Many thanks,
Sergio
>
>I'm still to figure out why 2.2.16+ won't boot?! I suppose it's just
>broken.
I'm interested to know if my 2.2.17pre20 on ppclinux.apple.com/~benh
(binaries posted today) also fails to boot your machine, and and which
point in boot does it stop ?
Ben.
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 12:31:09AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
[sorry for my late reply on this]
> > Doh! It is /vmlinux - now I end up here:
> >
> > Second-stage QUIK loader
> > boot:
> > Starting at 0
> > opening display /[EMAIL PROTECTED] failed
>
> this seems to be typical and non-fatal. (i
Daniel Holzkenner wrote:
> i installed the base2_2.tgz package on my HD
> how can i do to install the rest of the files (.deb) packages please ?
> i don't have CDROM and i don't have FTP or HTTP connection
> all .deb files are on my HD (i leeched the /binary-powerpc dir)
> but i dunno how i can us
Hi Michael,
I'm also running debian on a 7200. Unlike Adam but like Ethan's friend,
the last kernel I could got running was 2.2.14. I have tried 2.2.15 and
2.2.16 and neither would work. I have yet to compile my own kernel
though so maybe something will be different there. I have tried a ke
after going through the install process several times, i still can't get
potato to boot from the disk. i'm using boot-floppy-hfs.img, and an ide
disk. i've installed on intel hundreds of times, and quite a few on sparc,
but this is my first experience of any kind with a mac. any idea what's
wrong?
>
>Rather convincing, how can I get it via rsync?
>
I think there are mirrors on penguinppc.org.
Ben.
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> >> For 2.4, I suggest you use the bitkeeper tree.
> >
> >I remember reading somewhere that it's mainly for PReP/CHRP while pmac-devel
> >was supposed to be for PowerMacs. What's the advantage of bitkeeper for
> >PowerMac users?
>
> pmac-devel is Paul's tree. Whil
>> For 2.4, I suggest you use the bitkeeper tree.
>
>I remember reading somewhere that it's mainly for PReP/CHRP while pmac-devel
>was supposed to be for PowerMacs. What's the advantage of bitkeeper for
>PowerMac users?
pmac-devel is Paul's tree. While a bunch of PPC developers (including me
;) ha
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> For 2.4, I suggest you use the bitkeeper tree.
I remember reading somewhere that it's mainly for PReP/CHRP while pmac-devel
was supposed to be for PowerMacs. What's the advantage of bitkeeper for
PowerMac users?
Michel
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \
>I see that both
>linuxcare.com.au::linux-pmac-devel /usr/src/linux-stable
>linuxcare.com.au::linux-pmac-devel /usr/src/linux-unstable
>
>are not being updated as they used to. I would like to
>know
>1. if this tree is still alive, and
>2. what is the official kernel tree for PPC
If you are look
Björn Johansson wrote:
> Is the screenmode PAL:lowres(320x256) supported by the X-server(Xfree86)?
In 3.3.x: yes. In 4.x: not yet probably. I'm currently working on it.
> If it is, how do I change it in my XF86Config file? By the way, I'm
> currently running Xfree86 3.3.6 with AGA =(.
Can't he
Hi,
I see that both
linuxcare.com.au::linux-pmac-devel /usr/src/linux-stable
linuxcare.com.au::linux-pmac-devel /usr/src/linux-unstable
are not being updated as they used to. I would like to
know
1. if this tree is still alive, and
2. what is the official kernel tree for PPC
Thanks,
Sergio
Björn Johansson wrote:
>
> Since my system is in a mess =), I skipped the apt-get
> bit and installed every archive using DPKG. When installing
> kdelibs3_2.0 it said that it needed libssl09. I searched on
> Altavista and the Debian ftp, but so far I have just found
> the Intel binary, where's th
22 matches
Mail list logo
