"C.M. Connelly" wrote:
> One rant that's still on my to-do list is for people who send HTML
> to mailing lists. I hate that. ;-P
>
>CMC
>
> P.S. Good thing I haven't gotten around to adding a filter rule to
> class HTML mail as spam (most of it is), or I would have
> missed you
Kent,
What I sometimes do is write the rant, then save it somewhere and
get away from the computer for a while.
If I still feel the same way a day or two later, I'll reconsider
sending the rant as-is to the person or group who inspired it.
That rarely happens. Sometimes I rework it into a more
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
OK, let's try this again.
!!!RANTS DO NO GOOD!!!
Not for the goal of getting a solution, or for the benefit of the list
members. But rants can, in some cases, do a world of good, psychologically,
for the ranter. I'm not suggesting that we consider them socially acceptable
To automatically see the package tree differences by architecture, go to:
http://buildd.debian.org/quinn-diff/
Note that there is no autobuilder running for woody/ppc. The powerpc build
daemon will switch to woody once potato is done.
> > OK, let's try this again.
> >
> > !!!RANTS DO NO GOOD!!!
Nor does yelling out loud :-)
> > Patches are fine. Suggestions are welcome, although it's more than a
> > little bit late for them. Rants do no one any good, and get
> > short-tempered replies like this one is shaping up to be.
>
Quoting Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi List,
>
> Can someone here explain to me how the build daemon is supposed
> to work? Last week I was whining to our debian packager about
> the ppc guys being so slow to build new packages. He enlightened
> me saying that (in this case lilypon
Aaron Davies wrote:
>
> I've finished the basic install off the ramdisk, so I rebooted, turned off
> the ramdisk in the BootX dialog, and hit linux. Then I got "Kernerl Panic:
> no init found. Try passing init= to the kernel". What option do I need to
> use here?
Have you specified the (correct)
> Joe Emenaker wrote: [..snipped..]
>
> IBM is going to be giving our college a few RS/6000 servers.
>
> My question is: Are there particular flavors of IBM's 7024, 7025, and 7026
> that people have had particularly good or bad experience with when trying to
> run Debian on them?
Have a look at
I've finished the basic install off the ramdisk, so I rebooted, turned off the
ramdisk in the BootX dialog, and hit linux. Then I got "Kernerl Panic: no init
found. Try passing init= to the kernel". What option do I need to use here?
--
____
/ )
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> OK, let's try this again.
>
> !!!RANTS DO NO GOOD!!!
>
> Patches are fine. Suggestions are welcome, although it's more than a
> little bit late for them. Rants do no one any good, and get
> short-tempered replies like this one is shaping up to be.
The problem is t
10 matches
Mail list logo
