On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, David Welton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 08:35:26AM +0100, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > > it gets stuck after printing "instantiating rtas... done" but before it
> > > manages to initialize the framebuffer.
>
> Yes, it exits prom_init, and then dies somewhere. Where, precis
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Matt Porter wrote:
> This is a known problem with interrupt handling on PReP.
>
> It's harmless except that it is wasting a lot of cycles in irq servicing
> for nothing (and syslog space).
Good! I noticed the printcon about Blackhawk interrupt handling, figured
I'd check. I'
Kevin Puetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > First, I can find no X configuration tools. Secondly, I can=t find any
> > existing XF86Config files, for manual configuration in lack of X conf.
> > tool.s
> [...]
> Q for someone - why don't we have Xconfigurator (which might be
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 11:52:17PM -0800, Aaron Burt wrote:
> Well, I got DebPPC on my Blackhawk recently. However, both the PReP
> kernel supplied with the latest unstable and the one I built from the
> 2.2.13 source deb have a couple problems:
>
> Regular "Bogus Interrupt" messages that seem t
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> 266 is a good value for 604e with 133 MHz. It is nearly factor 2 (1.99).
Wow. Efficient.
> What reports cat /dev/sndstat ?
cat /dev/sndstat
OSS/Free:3.8s2++-971130
Load type: Driver loaded as a module
Kernel: Linux a-aburt4 2.2.13 #3 Tue
> Bad BogoMIPS calculation? saytime and mp3blaster play sounds at a really
> high pitch. My 604/133 is reported as 266 BogoMIPS, which doesn't seem
> right.
266 is a good value for 604e with 133 MHz. It is nearly factor 2 (1.99).
200 MHz gives nearly 400 (398), and my 233 MHz gives me 46
Well, I got DebPPC on my Blackhawk recently. However, both the PReP
kernel supplied with the latest unstable and the one I built from the
2.2.13 source deb have a couple problems:
Regular "Bogus Interrupt" messages that seem to be triggered by the
keyboard.
Bad BogoMIPS calculation? saytime an
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 08:35:26AM +0100, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > another data point: chrp appears to have problems with the new gcc.
> No, it isn't gcc2.95, it is the kernel, the 2.2.x one. 2.3.x will
> boot, but the curent kernel versions are so buggy with so many
> compile errors :-((
> >
> another data point: chrp appears to have problems with the new gcc.
No, it isn't gcc2.95, it is the kernel, the 2.2.x one. 2.3.x will boot, but
the curent kernel versions are so buggy with so many compile errors :-((
> using franz sirl's gcc 2.95.2 (0h), 2.2.12 (specifically, cort's 19990903
>
another data point: chrp appears to have problems with the new gcc.
using franz sirl's gcc 2.95.2 (0h), 2.2.12 (specifically, cort's 19990903
snapshot) fails to boot on the ibm f50 i'm using.
it gets stuck after printing "instantiating rtas... done" but before it
manages to initialize the framebu
10 matches
Mail list logo
