Greetings! There is a known bug in the latest upstream stable lam,
which it sounds like you're running into here. The developers have
sent me a beta, which works great here. The have asked me to wait for
their next stable release before uploading to Debian. I just sent
them a followup note on t
This bug is present in gcc-2.95.1 and in the gcc snapshot extracted the
21 th October from CVS with the correct gcc-2.95.2 branch tag.
Attached with this mail you will find :
1) The C code that triggers the bug (standalone so that you can
regenerate it)
2) The side by side asm code
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> I will try, but my computer died last weekend, i will maybe get a new one this
Poor boy...
> afternoon, but it is not guaranteed it will work for me. Having an amiga
> formatted harddisk, also poses problems when trying to read the partition from
> anothe
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 09:22:48AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 10:23:10AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > >
> > > > Notice this are all debian patches, not only the one for powerpc. They
>
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > >My beige G3 contains "Power Macintosh" in the "model" property, My
> > >wallstreet
> > >PowerBook contains "PowerBook" and an iMac I have here returns "iMac".
> > >
> > >I beleive you should also check the device tree's "compatible" property and
> >
On 23/10/99 Jeramy B Smith wrote:
I'm not under the opinion that all software should be free, BUT I was also
dismayed that I needed a MacOS partition to boot my beige g3 desktop.
partly its non free, mostly because its a big waste of space for a
useless OS I have no interest in using. beside
> The reason I ask is it looks as if the newer macs OF is broken in
> such a way that it will require a partition dedicated to holding the
> boot loader (if you want to get rid of non-Free macos)
I'm not under the opinion that all software should be free, BUT I was also
dismayed that I needed a M
On 22/10/99 Phillip R. Jaenke wrote:
To do so actually would be trivial. And I like that idea. Millions of
idiots have 540M dos disks or something lying around, DOS is pretty
widely accepted unfortunately, and ext2's one of those oddball
filesystems like XFS only ext2 sucks more. (I WANT EXT3 NO
Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Does the Debian PPC installer work OK with DOS partition tables? as
> in the same partition tables we use on intel machines?
>
> The reason I ask is it looks as if the newer macs OF is broken in
> such a way that it will require a partition dedicated to holdin
VALETTE Eric wrote:
>
> Environment information
> ---
> 53 powermac1:/tmp->uname -a
> Linux powermac1 2.2.12 #1 Sat Sep 4 17:53:53 MDT 1999 ppc unknown
> 54 powermac1:/tmp->gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-linux/2.95.1/specs
> gcc version 2.95.1 19990816 (re
Hello,
Does the Debian PPC installer work OK with DOS partition tables? as
in the same partition tables we use on intel machines?
The reason I ask is it looks as if the newer macs OF is broken in
such a way that it will require a partition dedicated to holding the
boot loader (if you want t
11 matches
Mail list logo
