Re: xterm failed, 2.1 dependencies

1998-11-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Nov 15, 1998 at 01:58:31PM -0500, Josh Huber wrote: > On Sun, 15 Nov 1998, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > seeing from a simple ls /lib, it's 2.0.95. Is there a new 2.0.100 .deb? > > > > Yes, it's in all the mirrors now. > I'm a little unclear as to how I should be installing debian stil

Re: xterm failed, 2.1 dependencies

1998-11-15 Thread Josh Huber
On Sun, 15 Nov 1998, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > seeing from a simple ls /lib, it's 2.0.95. Is there a new 2.0.100 .deb? > > Yes, it's in all the mirrors now. I'm a little unclear as to how I should be installing debian still. Does it matter that the base tar file has a different glibc version

Re: xterm failed, 2.1 dependencies

1998-11-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Nov 15, 1998 at 08:22:01PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Nov 1998, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > Which glibc are you using? I'm on 2.0.100 now, and while the library > > can handle backward compatible binaries, the binaries can not handle > > backward compatible l

Re: xterm failed, 2.1 dependencies

1998-11-15 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
On Sun, 15 Nov 1998, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Which glibc are you using? I'm on 2.0.100 now, and while the library > can handle backward compatible binaries, the binaries can not handle > backward compatible libraries. You'll need to upgrade to use it. The > new libraries seem to be working

Re: xterm failed, 2.1 dependencies

1998-11-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Nov 15, 1998 at 07:05:58PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > I just got the X packages from dan's web space and while they work fine > for the most part, some files (xterm, xfb server) fail with an error like > the following > > xterm: error in loading shared libraries: xterm: symbol

Re: xterm failed, 2.1 dependencies

1998-11-15 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 15-Nov-98, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > So, could anyone either send me/upload a working xterm/glibc ? As it is > running X without an xterm is useless. I have the same problem, but until it's fixed I use xvt as a replacement for xterm. Works w/o any problems. Regards Michel -- Man wil

xterm failed, 2.1 dependencies

1998-11-15 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
I just got the X packages from dan's web space and while they work fine for the most part, some files (xterm, xfb server) fail with an error like the following xterm: error in loading shared libraries: xterm: symbol chown, version GLIBC_2_1 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference.

Re: Debian on Umax APUS

1998-11-15 Thread Blackie
On 13 Nov 1998, Jesper Skov wrote: > > "Blackie" == Blackie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Blackie> We have Umax APUS PPC clone with LinuxPPC distribution but we > > What does APUS mean? :) > > Jesper > I don't know what APUS means. Description of this computer: Umax APUS 2000 PPC603e/160 M

Re: ldconfig obsoleted by ld.so package

1998-11-15 Thread Roberto Lumbreras
On Thursday, November 12 1998, at 22:22:56, Loic Prylli wrote: : : Hello, : : Looks like when you build ldso from source on Alpha (and probably on : powerpc), it now builds just the ldconfig binary, so exactly what was : provided by the ldconfig package. So I guess now the ldconfig package : can