package: debian-policy
version: 3.9.5.0
severity: wishlist
Hello, an example of architecture-restricted dependency with more than
one arch should probably be added to the section 7.1 "Syntax of
relationship fields" of the policy. The document already specify that
the list is space-separated, but a
Hello,
I've just checked the policy, and it does not say where the translated man
pages should go. The FHS is clear on this point (see
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.1/fhs-4.7.2.html), and as the policy says we
should follow it, it's not a critical issue, but I think it would be good to
update the
Hello,
I'm not a dd, so I can't do this as a formal policy change proposal, but
I've noticed that a bunch of packages use the section 'debian-installer',
which in not listed in the policy as a valid section (in part 2.1.7).
The list of these packages is:
ddetect, dhcp, udpkg, cdebconf, wget-retr
[debian-i18n CCed for obvious reason, debian-policy CCed because I'm not
sure anymore who decides which pseudo-package exists]
Hello,
As coordinator of the french translation team, we would like to ask for the
creation of a new pseudo package in the BTS. It would be called l10n-french,
and woul
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 08:49:15PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
>
> > Em Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:16:19 -0600 (CST), Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > escreveu:
> >
> > > > Thanks for creating this pseudo module, or for indicating who I should
> > > >
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 at 22:53:52 +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:51:45AM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 08:49:15PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not convinced. Everything you say can be done perfectly
6 matches
Mail list logo
