Bug#1068022: Document the Testsuite-Triggers field

2024-04-05 Thread Christian Kastner
Hi again, On 2024-03-29 20:30, Christian Kastner wrote: > Policy 5.6.30 lists the Testsuite field, but it doesn't list the > Testsuite-Triggers field that seems to be part of Sources files and is > generated by dpkg-source >= 1.18.8. > > This field is quite useful, as given my package src:foo, I

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-free

2024-04-05 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:58:37PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Thanks Philipp. Following that result, please find a patch proposal: > > --- a/policy/ch-source.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst > @@ -338,9 +338,9 @@ > For example, the build target should pass ``--disable-silent-rules`` > to an

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-freeo

2024-04-05 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2024-04-04 22:38, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 01:22:19PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I'm not sure what I think about that. We have a general escape hatch > > already for non-free packages in Policy 2.2.3 that says they may not fully > > comply with Policy, which may be su

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-freeo

2024-04-05 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Aurelien" == Aurelien Jarno writes: Aurelien> If we go that route, here is a proposed alternative patch: Aurelien> --- a/policy/ch-source.rst Aurelien> +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst Aurelien> @@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ Aurelien> For example, the build target should pass ``--di

Bug#1068022: Document the Testsuite-Triggers field

2024-04-05 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Fri 05 Apr 2024 at 11:30am +02, Christian Kastner wrote: > Hi again, > > On 2024-03-29 20:30, Christian Kastner wrote: >> Policy 5.6.30 lists the Testsuite field, but it doesn't list the >> Testsuite-Triggers field that seems to be part of Sources files and is >> generated by dpkg-sourc

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-freeo

2024-04-05 Thread Sean Whitton
Hi Russ, We have two seconded solutions, so you and I should perhaps break the tie. I prefer the Bill's 'Autobuild: no' solution as the more conservative change: we only have data about packages that are currently autobuilt, not those that aren't, so we might be making those buggy if we just ban

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-freeo

2024-04-05 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sat 06 Apr 2024 at 12:15pm +08, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hi Russ, > > We have two seconded solutions, so you and I should perhaps break the > tie. I prefer the Bill's 'Autobuild: no' solution as the more > conservative change: we only have data about packages that are currently > autobuil