Hi again, On 2024-03-29 20:30, Christian Kastner wrote: > Policy 5.6.30 lists the Testsuite field, but it doesn't list the > Testsuite-Triggers field that seems to be part of Sources files and is > generated by dpkg-source >= 1.18.8. > > This field is quite useful, as given my package src:foo, I can find out > which packages have autopkgtests that depend on it, and are thus in the > set of reverse dependencies that I could check for breakage.
I've read up on the change process [1], and I guess my proposal to submit a patch was too far into the process. Thus, I take a step back, and seek discussion first. In addition to what I've said above, I think documenting this field would not only enhance discoverability, but give more weight to it for tooling that makes use of these fields. For discussion context, I'd like to quote dsc(5) on this field: > Testsuite-Triggers: package-list > > This field declares the comma-separated union of all test dependencies > (Depends fields in debian/tests/control file), with all restrictions removed, > and OR dependencies flattened (that is, converted to separate AND > relationships), except for binaries generated by this source package and its > meta-dependency equivalent @. > > Rationale: this field is needed because otherwise to be able to get the test > dependencies, each source package would need to be unpacked. Best, Christian [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ap-process.html
