Le Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 11:26:33AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:16:08PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
> >
> > I believe this should be a blocker --- it is an instance of the
> > document and actual practice clearly contradicting one another. I
> > wouldn't mind
Le Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:09:05AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 06:47:40PM +0100, gregor herrmann a écrit :
> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:24:21 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >
> > > For what it's worth, I find the text more readable after JBR's changes
> > > than before
Hi Charles,
Charles Plessy wrote:
> here is an update of the English proofreading (attached as a patch).
Looks good to me.
[...]
> - "Another kind of list value has one value per line". Not
> straightforward...
Doesn't seem so bad. How would you propose rewording it?
> - "the Copyright f
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Charles Plessy wrote:
>> - "Another kind of list value has one value per line". Not
>> straightforward...
>
> Doesn't seem so bad. How would you propose rewording it?
Shouldn't it be "Another type of list has one value per line"? The
values don't have one value per l
Justin B Rye wrote:
>> Charles Plessy wrote:
>>> - "Another kind of list value has one value per line". Not
>>> straightforward...
[...]
> Shouldn't it be "Another type of list has one value per line"? The
> values don't have one value per line - they only have one line each.
Makes sense. I
Charles Plessy wrote:
> would the following changes solve the problem with license exceptions ?
Here's some tweaks for application on top. With these tweaks, I'm
happy with it.
copyright-format/copyright-format.xml | 14 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff -
6 matches
Mail list logo
