Hi,
any news on how to solve this issue?
Anything I could do?
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201201141258.05187.hol...@la
Le 13/01/2012 22:54, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 09:41:10AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:42:12 +0900
>> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Japanese PDF:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~taffit/developers-reference-xetex/developers-reference.ja.pdf
>> Most of
Hi,
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any news on how to solve this issue?
>
> Anything I could do?
Sure. Could you give a summary of the discussion, what options we
should be choosing among in clarifying or changing policy, and the
advantages or disadvantages of each option?
Thanks much for your
Dear developers,
When multiarch was introduced, it was implied that a tool to query the
multiarch would be standardised. However unless I missed need, no such
tool exist yet. This is problematic when building older version of software.
with legacy build systems that needs to know the path to a li
4 matches
Mail list logo