On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:45:25PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bill Allombert writes:
>
> > Dear developers,
>
> > The attached patch documents the new 'Build-Features: build-arch'
> > control field in dpkg 1.16.1. This is an updated version of a patch
> > already proposed in bug #218893 on 12
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:29:12AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:02:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > (Sending this to 629...@bugs.debian.org, which is the cloned bug actually
> > assigned to the TC...)
Too much magic, but thanks anyway.
> > On Tu
Bill Allombert writes:
> Note that I did not ask for second.
> However lintian does not appear to be exercising such restrain:
[...]
> This is happens even for package that build a single binary whether
> arch-all or arch-indep, which does not seems terribly useful.
It's a warning, not an erro
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:41:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bill Allombert writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:45:25PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> > > For the record (and for anyone following this bug), we should hold on
> > > action on this until the TC decides the way forward for build
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 12:18:53AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:41:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Bill Allombert writes:
> > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:45:25PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >
> > > > For the record (and for anyone following this bug), we should h
Bill Allombert writes:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:41:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The other advantage of Lintian warning on this is that it means we're
>> now collecting that data for the whole archive.
> Not my point. Maybe you missed the line
> N: These targets will be required by
Roger Leigh writes:
> However, it was my understanding from the discussion that the proposals
> being discussed here are basically about how best to realise the goal of
> having build-arch and build-indep implemented; I thought that the goal
> itself was relatively uncontroversial, but the means
7 matches
Mail list logo
