On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:41:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bill Allombert <bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> writes: > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:45:25PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > > For the record (and for anyone following this bug), we should hold on > > > action on this until the TC decides the way forward for build-arch. > > > Note that I did not ask for second. > > However lintian does not appear to be exercising such restrain: > > The other advantage of Lintian warning on this is that it means we're now > collecting that data for the whole archive.
Not my point. Maybe you missed the line N: These targets will be required by policy in the future, so should be N: added to prevent future breakage. which is basically assuming the outcome (and leads the reader to believe that a decision has been reached while the issue is still under discussion). Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110630221853.GN30013@yellowpig
