Hi,
Policy reads:
"All libraries must have a shared version in the lib* package and a static
version in the lib*-dev package"
I'm not too keen on providing static versions of libraries who's intent are
for embedded devices. The idea, of course, for embedded devices are to have
as
"Ivan E. Moore II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Policy reads:
>
> "All libraries must have a shared version in the lib* package and
> a static version in the lib*-dev package"
>
>I'm not too keen on providing static versions of libraries who's intent are
> for embedded d
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:21:45AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> "All libraries must have a shared version in the lib* package and a
> static version in the lib*-dev package"
>
>I'm not too keen on providing static versions of libraries [whose]
> intent [is use in] embedded devices.
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The static version of a library must be compiled without the
> -fPIC option. It must be placed in the development
> package, normally lib*-dev, but if its size
> exceeds the size of the rest of the files in the development
>
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:42:40PM +, James Troup wrote:
> > The static version of a library must be compiled without the
> > -fPIC option. It must be placed in the development
> > package, normally lib*-dev, but if its size
> > exceeds the size of the rest of the files
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The static version of a library must be compiled without the
> > -fPIC option. It must be placed in the development
> > package, normally lib*-dev, but if its size
> > exceeds th
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For the record, I *need* static libraries.
Why?
--
James
> "Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Josip> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:21:45AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II
Josip> wrote:
>> "All libraries must have a shared version in the lib* package
>> and a static version in the lib*-dev package"
>>
>> I'm not too keen
Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However disks are cheap enough that it seems reasonable to ask
> people doing development to go buy a big disk.
It's not about disks so much as bandwidth. Disk may be cheap, but
bandwidth isn't, at lesast not universally. I've also no idea who
would wan
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:56:48PM +, James Troup wrote:
>Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> However disks are cheap enough that it seems reasonable to ask
>> people doing development to go buy a big disk.
>
>It's not about disks so much as bandwidth. Disk may be cheap, but
>bandwidt
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:16:29AM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:56:48PM +, James Troup wrote:
> >Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> However disks are cheap enough that it seems reasonable to ask
> >> people doing development to go buy a big disk.
> >
>
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:33:04PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Josip> I'm not too keen on providing static versions at all. I
> Josip> can't remember I last saw someone use a -dev package for
> Josip> that. People usually need a -dev package for the .so file
> Josip> and the .h file
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:56:48PM +, James Troup wrote:
> It's not about disks so much as bandwidth. Disk may be cheap, but
> bandwidth isn't, at lesast not universally. I've also no idea who
> would want or need static libraries in this day and age, but maybe I'm
> missing something obvious
> It's not about disks so much as bandwidth. Disk may be cheap, but
> bandwidth isn't, at lesast not universally. I've also no idea who
> would want or need static libraries in this day and age, but maybe I'm
> missing something obvious.
zsh-static needs a static libc and ncurses
sash needs a st
On Thursday 06 February 2003 13:57, Josip Rodin wrote:
> >
> > However disks are cheap enough that it seems reasonable to ask people
> > doing development to go buy a big disk.
>
> IME it's not the disk space that's so much of an issue, it's the bandwidth!
> Having to get 5 MB (all devel. stuff in
> >> >>"Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The original conversation I had waaay back with the webserver guys
> > is that they wouldn't go ahead with these changes until it _was_ official
> > policy. If you require it to be done before it becomes official policy
> > the
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:56:48PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However disks are cheap enough that it seems reasonable to ask
> > people doing development to go buy a big disk.
> It's not about disks so much as bandwidth. Disk may be cheap, but
> bandwid
17 matches
Mail list logo
