Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-01 Thread Steve Kowalik
At 11:26 pm, Wednesday, May 1 2002, Julian Gilbey mumbled: > That sounds like a fabulous idea. What I would *really* like to see > happen (and help with), post-woody, is something like the annotated C > reference manual, which has the standard clearly identified, but lots > of extra bits of ratio

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-01 Thread Anthony Towns
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:46:17PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Apropos to that, Policy proper contains elements that ought > > not to be in there, but remain as vestigial documentation of dpkg > > (which is how policy started). Policy is going to be cleaned up and, > > and perhaps

[no subject]

2002-05-01 Thread laurent mpeti kabila
REQUEST FOR URGENT BUSINESS ASSISTANCE -- Your contact was availed to me by the chamber of commerce. It was given to me because of my diplomatic status as I did not disclose the actual reasons for which I sought your contact. But I was assured That you are reputa

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-01 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes: >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:46:17PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> > Apropos to that, Policy proper contains elements that ought >> > not to be in there, but remain as vestigial documentation of dpkg >> > (which is how policy started). Policy is

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-01 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:46:17PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > Apropos to that, Policy proper contains elements that ought > not to be in there, but remain as vestigial documentation of dpkg > (which is how policy started). Policy is going to be cleaned up and, > and perhaps