Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server

2001-11-16 Thread Francesco Lovergine
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:14:12PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > telnet-server is useful because it allows you to conflict with all the > packages that run a telnetd. If your intent is for all radius daemons > to conflict with radius-server, then I agree the the vp is useful. > After some discussi

Bug#119821: [PROPOSAL] Postscript files requirements

2001-11-16 Thread Yann Dirson
Package: debian-policy Version: N/A; reported 2001-11-16 Severity: normal I propose that we add a section under the "documentation" chapter, to request a minimum of coherence and sanity of PostScript files. My problem is that some maintainers (probably for paper-saving reasons, which in itself is

Processed: New email address

2001-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 68146 Bug#68146: RFA: fvwm1 -- Old version of the F(?) Virtual Window Manager Bug closed, send any further explanations to "Julian Gilbey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > reopen 68146 ! Bug#68146: RFA: fvwm1 -- Old version of the F(?) Virtual Window Manage

Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server

2001-11-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:52:01AM +0100, Francesco Lovergine wrote: > After some discussion it seems correct to introduce a VP radius-server > as a provides-conflicts-replaces type of (a la sendmail & friends :)). > So if none has more objections I'll change in accepted this bug > and notify curr

Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server

2001-11-16 Thread Francesco Lovergine
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:04:24PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:52:01AM +0100, Francesco Lovergine wrote: > > A

Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server

2001-11-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:20:47PM +0100, Francesco Lovergine wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:52:01AM +0100, Francesco Lovergine wrote: > > > After some discussion it seems correct to introduce a VP radius-server > > > as a provides-conflicts-replaces type of (a la sendmail & friends :)). > >

Processed: your mail

2001-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 118608 [ACCEPTED] New virtual package radius-server Bug#118608: [PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server Changed Bug title. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a s eparate package

2001-11-16 Thread Joey Hess
Branden Robinson wrote: > I think both should be forbidden. > > ELF objects, minor or major, must declare shared library dependencies > as Depends. > > ELF objects, minor or major, that link against non-free shared libraries > must not go into main. Why are ELF objects so special? If we have a r