On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:20:47PM +0100, Francesco Lovergine wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:52:01AM +0100, Francesco Lovergine wrote:
> > > After some discussion it seems correct to introduce a VP radius-server
> > > as a provides-conflicts-replaces type of (a la sendmail & friends :)).
> > > So if none has more objections I'll change in accepted this bug
> > > and notify current maintainers for the new policy.
> > >
> > > What's not clear to me is if new pkgs could be uploaded soon also
> > > with policy frozen or they need to wait for policy update...
> >
> > If they agree on it, it should be fine. We'll put it into policy
> > after woody is released.
> >
> And pkgs should refer anyway to the current policy, I think...
Yes, but as long as all the radiusd-providing packages agree with
this, they can operate it between themselves. Policy allows for
this.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Queen Mary, Univ. of London see http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~jdg/ or http://www.debian.org/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
Also: http://www.helpthehungry.org/
