CVS jdg: Policy should now conflict with and replace packaging-manual

2001-02-24 Thread debian-policy
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: jdg Sat Feb 24 17:12:55 PST 2001 Modified files: debian : changelog control Log message: Policy should now conflict with and replace packaging-manual

Bug#87233: wording in section 9.2.2 could be better

2001-02-24 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:32:17PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Package: debian-policy > Version: 3.5.2.0 > Severity: normal > > The wording used in the footnote for section 9.2.2 could be better. It > seems to have been copied from an email I send to debian-devel and > debian-policy a while a

Bug#87510: [PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST

2001-02-24 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.5.2.0 Severity: wishlist Policy should now require packages to specify build time dependencies (i.e., packages which require ... MUST specify...) Build time dependencies have been in policy for 18 months already. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Package: debian-policy > Version: 3.5.2.0 > Severity: wishlist > > Policy should now require packages to specify build time dependencies > (i.e., packages which require ... MUST specify...) seconded. yours,

Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST

2001-02-24 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010225 01:41]: > Policy should now require packages to specify build time dependencies > (i.e., packages which require ... MUST specify...) Seconded. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpMyoivaS0ld.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST

2001-02-24 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Policy should now require packages to specify build time dependencies > (i.e., packages which require ... MUST specify...) seconded. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In

Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST

2001-02-24 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 01:41:40AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Package: debian-policy > Version: 3.5.2.0 > Severity: wishlist > > Policy should now require packages to specify build time dependencies > (i.e., packages which require ... MUST specify...) I object to this; in sid there are 4284 so

Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Palfrader
> If you'd like to change this, please file wishlist bugs against packages > that don't have Build-Depends, with the correct Build-Depends: line. Once > we're at, say, 90% of packages (another 1618 packages away) supporting > Build-Depends, then it'd be a good idea to revisit this, but until then,

Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST

2001-02-24 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 01:04:47PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 01:41:40AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Policy should now require packages to specify build time dependencies > > (i.e., packages which require ... MUST specify...) > I object to this; in sid there are 4284

Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Palfrader
Hi Julian! On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > Package: debian-policy > > Version: 3.5.2.0 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Policy should now require packages to specify build time dependencies > > (i.e., packages which require ... MUST sp

Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST

2001-02-24 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 04:12:33AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > If you'd like to change this, please file wishlist bugs against packages > > that don't have Build-Depends, with the correct Build-Depends: line. Once > > we're at, say, 90% of packages (another 1618 packages away) supporting > >