On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 04:12:33AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > If you'd like to change this, please file wishlist bugs against packages > > that don't have Build-Depends, with the correct Build-Depends: line. Once > > we're at, say, 90% of packages (another 1618 packages away) supporting > > Build-Depends, then it'd be a good idea to revisit this, but until then, > > and especially when we're trying to release, this is a very bad idea. > I think we agree that this goal cannot be reached for woody, but > it should be reachable for woody+1.
It'll be reached when it's reached; and it shouldn't go into policy until it's essentially already been reached; whether that's next week, during woody+1's development, or during woody+10's development. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
pgpni5LvGmBLr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
