CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: srivastaTue Jan 16 22:02:31 PST 2001
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml
Log message:
typo
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: srivastaTue Jan 16 22:08:17 PST 2001
Modified files:
debian : rules
Log message:
fhs fails to build dvi
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: srivastaTue Jan 16 22:11:30 PST 2001
Modified files:
debian : rules
Log message:
fhs fails to build dvi
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 05:57:38AM -0800, debian-policy@lists.debian.org wrote:
> Log message:
> * Don't compress version.ent in the doc directory (it gets bigger!)
Thanks for all of those!
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jul
Installing:
policy.pdf.gz byhand
mime-policy.text.gz byhand
policy.text.gz byhand
policy.html.tar.gz byhand
libc6-migration.text byhand
virtual-package-names-list.text byhand
menu-policy.text.gz byhand
debian-policy_3.2.1.1.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.2.1.1.dsc
debian-policy
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:00 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#62943: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:00 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#69229: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#70634: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#70634: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#77645: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#78822: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:00 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#70442: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#72949: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#77404: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#77650: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#78809: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:04:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#82458: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 81106 procps
Bug#81106: Top expects username argument to "u" to be <=8 chars
Bug reassigned from package `top' to `procps'.
> reassign 61703 libc6
Bug#61703: timezones: Incorrect behavior after time change
Bug reassigned from package `timezone
Hi,
The FHS, now included by policy, already lays this out in
detail. I think there is no need to duplicate this in policy itself
(given the size the document has evolved to, any such redundancy is
undesirable).
I am closing this report; if you feel that this can pass
muster
Your message dated 17 Jan 2001 23:13:12 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#11094: Policy should mention that serial lines require
UUCP-style locking
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Hi,
Does someone have an interest in pushing these proposals
through? What is needed is to have the skeleton code written by
Julian fleshed out, add support for file-rc, and then submitted as a
patch for the sysvinit package.
Even then, it can only be recommended in policy unti
21 matches
Mail list logo
