On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 08:25:29PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jules Bean wrote:
[...]
> > On the other hand, I can't believe it's more than a ten minute change
> > to fix it. And we're not short of C programmers round here...
[...]
> rc kernel-headers-2.2.1 1.00
Branden Robinson wrote:
> The key phrase is "current dpkg". I don't this fix is in potato dpkg. A
> shame.
Actually, it is.
--
see shy jo
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 11:27:36PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The key phrase is "current dpkg". I don't this fix is in potato dpkg. A
> > shame.
>
> Actually, it is.
I stand happily corrected. Too bad we can't get groff to pay attention to
terminal width... :(
--
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 08:25:29PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> I resized my xterm and used a current dpkg.
Cool!
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 10:04:04AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> My original statement: "we should document the APIs provided by
> virtual packages."
>
> My modified statement in light of all the feedback I've gotten: "we
> should document whatever common interface (including none) that our
> virtu
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 03:14:55PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > How about:
> >
> > 12345678901234
> > deb-docs -> deb-docs
> > deb-packaging-> deb-packaging
> > deb-policy -> deb-policy
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 06:32:00PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 01:07:12AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > Every time you put more than one shell command (this
> > > > includes using a loop) in a makefile command you
> > > > - must make s
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 08:58:25AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > No debian packages currently begin with 'deb-'; let's not introduce a
> > new prefix.
>
> Curious. I had exactly the opposite thought. It would let us start
> fresh with a consistent naming scheme. Oh well.
We already have:
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 12:30:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > > Every time you put more than one shell command (this
> > > > > includes using a loop) in a makefile command you
> > > > > - must make sure that errors are trapped. For
> > > > > + should ma
Well, there was a lot of noise about Ian's proposals about policy
management, but we now seem to be stuck. It appears from an email he
sent that Manoj is unwilling to modify policy for the time being until
we have a concensus or dictate of some sort on this matter, and I sort
of agree. At the mom
10 matches
Mail list logo
