On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 10:05:52PM +, Steve Haslam wrote:
> > So to my way of thinking, no logs should be rotated if there isn't a
> > logrotate package installed. If there is one or not is up to the
> > administrator, though I strongly suggest one...
>
> So all packages that rotate their log
There is one part of this that I object to...
The requirement that xbase-clients be installed. In a console-only
environment, the admin shouldn't be forced to install a bunch of xclient
apps. There is atleast one console program that is following this
proceedure: bitchx.
Instead, I'd rather see
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 04:47:22PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> There is one part of this that I object to...
>
> The requirement that xbase-clients be installed. In a console-only
> environment, the admin shouldn't be forced to install a bunch of xclient
> apps. There is atleast one console
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 03:21:36PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I like this! (Read: seconded) At long last, we may be able to do
> away with the regular /usr/X11R6/bin vs. /usr/bin debate!
That's the hope (one of several, anyway).
> But if we accept this (which seems likely, given no objection
On 11-Jan-00, 17:13 (CST), Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's say cron's maintainer decides to convert
> /etc/cron.daily/standard to use logrotate, in concordance with the
> current policy manual.
Strictly speaking, there are no "log" files managed in
cron.daily/standard. There are
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> + Packages using the X Window System should abide by the FHS
> + standard whenever possible; they should install binaries,
> + libraries, manual pages, and other files in FHS-mandated
> + locations wherever possible; this means
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 03:21:36PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I like this! (Read: seconded) At long last, we may be able to do
> away with the regular /usr/X11R6/bin vs. /usr/bin debate!
Seconded as well. At one time we will be able to drop /usr/X11R6.
(I am certain that this will happen at
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 10:33:02PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > But if we accept this (which seems likely, given no objections
> > received so far), let's try to get the icon/pixmap/whatever issue
> > solved at the same time, because packages won't be permitted to use
> > /usr/X11R6/include/X
Hi, policy members.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
at Mon, 10 Jan 2000 02:48:23 +0900,
on Bug#54679: packaging-manual: Please include japanese translated version,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: packaging-manual
> Version: 3.1.1.1
>
> Please include Japanese translated version of p
* H.-Dirk Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the -policy folks:
gnome-users-guide-en has its files in /usr/share/gnome/help/users-guide/C/
/usr/share/doc/gnome-users-guide-en/html is a link to
../../gnome/help/users-guide/C
> My doc dir is a link to another partition (space probs). Because
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 08:22:33PM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> * H.-Dirk Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the -policy folks:
>
> gnome-users-guide-en has its files in /usr/share/gnome/help/users-guide/C/
>
> /usr/share/doc/gnome-users-guide-en/html is a link to
> ../../gnome/hel
* "Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Julian> On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 08:22:33PM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>> /usr/share/doc/gnome-users-guide-en/html is a link to
>> ../../gnome/help/users-guide/C
Julian> Hmm. Why can't you have the help files in /usr/share/doc and
Juli
12 matches
Mail list logo
