On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 12:06:53AM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> But this doesn't solve the other problem: dpkg -L shows these symlinks
> as real man pages. This is annoying at least for me...
But why on earth are you looking for manual pages with dpkg -L?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB (ex
On Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:04:19 +0200, you wrote:
>Marc Haber schrieb am Sonntag, den 27. Juni 1999:
>> /var/state isn't in the fsstnd, yet it exists on Debian slink. Is
>> there a text available that states what belongs into /var/state vs.
>> /var/lib ("application state information")?
>
>/var/state
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A better way to configure debian systems (#38703)
> * Stalled for 2 weeks.
> * Proposed on 1 Jun 1999 by Goswin Brederlow; seconded by Falk
> Hueffner.
> * Another configuration management proposal.
The one above replaces the one below.
> Configu
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 12:06:53AM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> > But this doesn't solve the other problem: dpkg -L shows these
> > symlinks as real man pages. This is annoying at least for me...
> But why on earth are you looking for manual pages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Darren O. Benham writes:
> Since there is interest in packaging census data, maps, genome data
> and other huge datasets I and since most people agreed that dropping them
> in main or contrib is not a great idea, I propose the creation of a data
> section to res
ae is required, as it is the only editor on the base system. This was
discussed in the past and I understood that we were going to leave it
alone.
If policy implies otherwise, we may need a clarification of the policy
that makes it clear where ae stands.
Personally, I have no problems setting th
Le 1999-06-28, Dale Scheetz écrivait :
> This was discussed in the past and I understood that we were going
> to leave it alone.
Yes. I submitted the bug on May 1st, before the discussion took
place, but for some reason it showed up in the BTS only yesterday.
Thomas.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would it be too radical to suggest that the maintainer who
> does not have the resources to write the man page at least
> file a bug report to remind himself (and perhaps signal volunteer man
> page writers) that the manual page is missing,
> Who reminds the volunteer that the man page needs to be updated each
> time the primary documentation is updated?
er.. whoever files the bug report that says the man page is out of date??
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> ae is required, as it is the only editor on the base system. This was
> discussed in the past and I understood that we were going to leave it
> alone.
I thought "being in the base system" and "being of required priority"
were orthogonal issues.
ae is in
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> > ae is required, as it is the only editor on the base system. This was
> > discussed in the past and I understood that we were going to leave it
> > alone.
>
> I thought "being in the base system" and "bein
11 matches
Mail list logo
