On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:57:42PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > Seems to me there's still a gaping hole in policy though. Is
> > > packages.debian.org really supposed to be the definitive arbiter of policy
> > > with regards to sections? The grep-available trick is obscure enough to
> > > no
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 08:32:23PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:54:45PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Seems to me there's still a gaping hole in policy though. Is
> > packages.debian.org really supposed to be the definitive arbiter of policy
> > with regards to sections?
On 20010313T203223+0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Well, none of these are the canonical source, they just read data from it --
> the override file, see the /indices/override.* files on every mirror.
Actually, the canonical source is Katie's database. Even the override
files are nowadays generated fro
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:54:45PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Seems to me there's still a gaping hole in policy though. Is
> packages.debian.org really supposed to be the definitive arbiter of policy
> with regards to sections? The grep-available trick is obscure enough to not
> count. Shouldn
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:54:45PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Seems to me there's still a gaping hole in policy though. Is
> packages.debian.org really supposed to be the definitive arbiter of policy
> with regards to sections? The grep-available trick is obscure enough to not
> count. Shouldn
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:03:51PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > > I'm packaging viewmol, a program for visualising molecules, used in
> > > computational chemistry.
> > >
> > > The question arises, what subsection should it be put into?
> > > A comparable program, rasmol, is already in debian,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 10:02:28PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > > I'm packaging viewmol, a program for visualising molecules, used in
> > > computational chemistry.
> > >
> > > The question arises, what subsection should it be put into?
> > > A comparable program, rasmol, is already in debi
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 05:20:31PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > I'm packaging viewmol, a program for visualising molecules, used in
> > computational chemistry.
> >
> > The question arises, what subsection should it be put into?
> > A comparable program, rasmol, is already
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 05:20:31PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I'm packaging viewmol, a program for visualising molecules, used in
> computational chemistry.
>
> The question arises, what subsection should it be put into?
> A comparable program, rasmol, is already in debian, in the math subsectio
Op zondag 11 maart 2001 07:20, schreef Drew Parsons:
> I therefore wonder if it would not be more appropriate to call this
> subsection "science" rather than "math" ?
I agree. That would make sense. /Me is also a chemist, and noticed
this before. I think science/math and science/social etc would b
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 11:36:21PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> Don't forget that you can have subsections (eg science/math,
> science/biology). This is already used for non-US/{contrib,non-free}; why
> not use it for things like this?
Wasn't aware of that.
btw its not necessary to quote my
Don't forget that you can have subsections (eg science/math,
science/biology). This is already used for non-US/{contrib,non-free}; why
not use it for things like this?
Regards,
Alex.
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 05:20:31PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > The
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 05:20:31PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> The question arises, what subsection should it be put into?
> A comparable program, rasmol, is already in debian, in the math subsection.
> But computational chemistry is not, strictly speaking, mathematics (it
> can be considered a su
I'm packaging viewmol, a program for visualising molecules, used in
computational chemistry.
The question arises, what subsection should it be put into?
A comparable program, rasmol, is already in debian, in the math subsection.
But computational chemistry is not, strictly speaking, mathematics (i
14 matches
Mail list logo
