Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Or GNU theirs. If GNU was involved in FHS discussions, there are
> probably good reasons why the FHS didn't take their views on board.
Having been there, it was pure conservatism, backed up with "why
bother". Not good reasons.
Thomas
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 12:30:24AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 03:56:52PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > GNU (read: the Hurd) is using /libexec (we don't have /usr) as well.
> > It is a good idea for some stuff IMHO.
> > The FHS should probably reconsider its point o
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 06:15:43PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marcus> GNU (read: the Hurd) is using /libexec (we don't have
> Marcus> /usr) as well. It is a good idea for some stuff IMHO.
> Marcus> The FHS should probably
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 01:58:19PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> > What about relase goal for woody :
> > with woody one will be able to have (/bin /usr/bin /usr/X11R6/bin
> > /usr/games) stuff in one directory, (/sbin + /usr/sbin), (/lib +
> > /usr/lib +
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 01:07:20PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> You could make a task- package to do this. That would be cool. Then
> people could try it both ways and see which they prefer.
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> > I onl
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I really don't see the use.. if I follow your logic then /usr/lib should
> be just libraries. Okay, but now I have a program that uses a couple
> of bitmaps in its userinterface.. lets make /usr/libbitmap then!
Actually it's /usr/include/X11/bitmap
At 18:15 +1100 2000-01-25, Brian May wrote:
>> "Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>writes:
>Marcus> GNU (read: the Hurd) is using /libexec (we don't have
>Marcus> /usr) as well. It is a good idea for some stuff IMHO.
>Marcus> The FHS should probably reconsider it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
You could make a task- package to do this. That would be cool. Then
people could try it both ways and see which they prefer.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> I only said : `one will be able to do so', not : `it will be our default'
> This real
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 01:58:19PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> > What about relase goal for woody :
> > with woody one will be able to have (/bin /usr/bin /usr/X11R6/bin
> > /usr/games) stuff in one directory, (/sbin + /usr/sbin), (/lib +
> > /usr/lib +
Previously Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> What about relase goal for woody :
> with woody one will be able to have (/bin /usr/bin /usr/X11R6/bin
> /usr/games) stuff in one directory, (/sbin + /usr/sbin), (/lib +
> /usr/lib + /usr/X11R6/lib) and (/usr/share/man + usr/X11R6/man) also
> as long as they
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 12:30:24AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Or GNU theirs. If GNU was involved in FHS discussions, there are
> probably good reasons why the FHS didn't take their views on board.
> If they weren't, then they should aim to follow the FHS anyway or aim
> to get involved in chang
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 03:56:52PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 12:55:49AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> > Instead of being slammed for inventing conspiracies where none would exist,
> > I would be perfectly happy to be proven wrong by someone providing
> > a link to
> "Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Instead of being slammed for inventing conspiracies where none
>> would exist, I would be perfectly happy to be proven wrong by
>> someone providing a link to such archives. As so many of you
>> eloquently put, my co
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 12:55:49AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Instead of being slammed for inventing conspiracies where none would exist,
> I would be perfectly happy to be proven wrong by someone providing
> a link to such archives. As so many of you
Previously Jonathan Walther wrote:
> Instead of being slammed for inventing conspiracies where none would exist,
> I would be perfectly happy to be proven wrong by someone providing
> a link to such archives. As so many of you eloquently put, my comments
> about /usr/libexec make me seem like an i
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 12:55:49AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> If I could see the archives, I WOULD research this before posting. So
> far I have mostly a gut feeling that /usr/libexec is elegant.
> /usr/lib for libraries! It just seems so confusing to be mixing up
> executable programs with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Instead of being slammed for inventing conspiracies where none would exist,
I would be perfectly happy to be proven wrong by someone providing
a link to such archives. As so many of you eloquently put, my comments
about /usr/libexec make me seem like an idiot be
On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 06:48:56PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Web searches don't seem to pull up any archives of the fhs-discuss mailing
> list. Is this some private secret list or something? I thought this was
> an "open" process?
>
> Jonathan
Yeah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Web searches don't seem to pull up any archives of the fhs-discuss mailing
list. Is this some private secret list or something? I thought this was
an "open" process?
Jonathan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBOIu9mcK9HT/Yf
19 matches
Mail list logo
