-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Instead of being slammed for inventing conspiracies where none would exist, I would be perfectly happy to be proven wrong by someone providing a link to such archives. As so many of you eloquently put, my comments about /usr/libexec make me seem like an idiot because "its not in the FHS".
If I could see the archives, I WOULD research this before posting. So far I have mostly a gut feeling that /usr/libexec is elegant. /usr/lib for libraries! It just seems so confusing to be mixing up executable programs with shared loadable libraries. A clear mixing of function. Or I could just have FreeBSD braindamage. Forgive the rambling; I just started fbsd kernel hacking and am finding it much easier to get into than the linux kernel. Jonathan On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 06:48:56PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote: > > Web searches don't seem to pull up any archives of the fhs-discuss mailing > > list. Is this some private secret list or something? I thought this was > > an "open" process? > Yeah that's it, it's all a big secret plot, and closed doors. Couldn't be > anything like a human-error, or something non-trolling like that. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBOIwTlsK9HT/YfGeBAQG6TwQAm40UgSWo6qyaLeoFiCicUvMWev5eooJ/ yOF6unS55daPweiAbOt4EXFh3H+5Gilgnv5EHg4hlxfl9CsE6WMND23Kpr+rSfRQ /FUvfB3VsMLLbid60SEHrq+1C26Y9a9AHPmTio5caWvSID5cQy3NuBwb84+5kLVM jBVcQNmz03A= =U+pU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
