Re: dpkg speed (was: Re: PROPOSAL: Extrafiles)

1998-06-09 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Remco Blaakmeer wrote: > Ok, but then dpkg still isn't sped up. The idea was, that a cache database > for dpkg's data files (available, status, *.info, etc.) would speed up > every call to dpkg during installation, configuration and removal of > packages. Every installation me

Re: dpkg speed (was: Re: PROPOSAL: Extrafiles)

1998-06-08 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Sun, 7 Jun 1998, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Jun 1998, Remco Blaakmeer wrote: > > > But that doesn't speed up dpkg's -s, -l, -S and -L options (and all the > > others that need to read the packages database, of course). That is what > > this proposal is about, speeding up dpkg calls.

Re: dpkg speed (was: Re: PROPOSAL: Extrafiles)

1998-06-07 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Sun, 7 Jun 1998, Remco Blaakmeer wrote: > But that doesn't speed up dpkg's -s, -l, -S and -L options (and all the > others that need to read the packages database, of course). That is what > this proposal is about, speeding up dpkg calls. I haven't tried apt yet, > since dselect (with the "mou

Re: dpkg speed (was: Re: PROPOSAL: Extrafiles)

1998-06-07 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Joey Hess wrote: > Doesn't apt already use a cache database? Seems the code is alreaqdy > written, then.. But that doesn't speed up dpkg's -s, -l, -S and -L options (and all the others that need to read the packages database, of course). That is what this proposal is about, sp

Re: dpkg speed (was: Re: PROPOSAL: Extrafiles)

1998-06-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Joey Hess wrote: > > If I am correct, this means that dpkg only needs to rebuild the database > > from scratch if the sysadmin has edited one or more of the text files. > > This could mean a much shorter startup time for dpkg. > > Doesn't apt already use a cache database? See

Re: dpkg speed (was: Re: PROPOSAL: Extrafiles)

1998-06-06 Thread Joey Hess
Remco Blaakmeer wrote: > That's why I and several other people have proposed a cache database. The > text files will still be the authoritative source of information for dpkg. > But after dpkg has read them and built its database in memory (as it does > now), it can save this database to disk. The

Re: dpkg speed (was: Re: PROPOSAL: Extrafiles)

1998-06-01 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, Anthony Towns wrote: > [please direct followups appropriately, this digression doesn't really > belong on -policy] > > On Sun, May 31, 1998 at 09:26:38PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > > > "Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes: > > Anthony> (as it stands, things like

dpkg speed (was: Re: PROPOSAL: Extrafiles)

1998-06-01 Thread Anthony Towns
[please direct followups appropriately, this digression doesn't really belong on -policy] On Sun, May 31, 1998 at 09:26:38PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > > "Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes: > Anthony> (as it stands, things like `dpkg --search /etc/passwd' > Anthony> results in